• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响初级医疗服务提供者在马来西亚公共医疗系统中作为“守门人”角色的因素。

Factors influencing the role of primary care providers as gatekeepers in the Malaysian public healthcare system.

作者信息

Ang K T, Ho B K, Mimi O, Salmah N, Salmiah M S, Noridah M S

机构信息

Ang Kim Teng, MPH, Institute for Health Management, Jalan Rumah Sakit, Off Jalan Bangsar, 59200 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Email:

Ho Bee Kiau, MMed (FamMed), Selangor Health Department, Malaysia

出版信息

Malays Fam Physician. 2014 Dec 31;9(3):2-11. eCollection 2014.

PMID:26425299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4568720/
Abstract

Primary care providers play an important gatekeeping role in ensuring appropriate referrals to secondary care facilities. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the level, pattern and rate of referrals from health clinics to hospitals in the public sector, and whether the placement of resident family medicine specialist (FMS) had made a significant difference. The study was carried out between March and April in 2012, involving 28 public primary care clinics. It showed that the average referral rate was 1.56% for clinics with resident FMS and 1.94% for those without resident FMS, but it was not statistically significant. Majority of referred cases were considered appropriate (96.1%). Results of the multivariate analysis showed that no prior consultation with senior healthcare provider and illnesses that were not severe and complex were independently associated with inappropriate referrals. Severity, complexity or uncertain diagnosis of patients' illness or injury significantly contributed to unavoidable referrals. Adequate facilities or having more experienced doctors could have avoided 14.5% of the referrals. The low referral rate and very high level of appropriate referrals could indicate that primary care providers in the public sector played an effective role as gatekeepers in the Malaysian public healthcare system.

摘要

基层医疗服务提供者在确保向二级医疗机构进行适当转诊方面发挥着重要的把关作用。这项横断面研究旨在确定公共部门健康诊所向医院转诊的水平、模式和比率,以及驻院家庭医学专科医生(FMS)的配置是否产生了显著差异。该研究于2012年3月至4月期间进行,涉及28家公共基层医疗诊所。结果显示,有驻院FMS的诊所平均转诊率为1.56%,没有驻院FMS的诊所平均转诊率为1.94%,但差异无统计学意义。大多数转诊病例被认为是适当的(96.1%)。多变量分析结果显示,未事先咨询高级医疗服务提供者以及病情不严重和不复杂的疾病与不适当转诊独立相关。患者疾病或损伤的严重程度、复杂性或诊断不确定性是不可避免转诊的重要因素。拥有足够的设施或更有经验的医生可避免14.5%的转诊。低转诊率和非常高的适当转诊水平可能表明,公共部门的基层医疗服务提供者在马来西亚公共医疗系统中作为把关人发挥了有效作用。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing the role of primary care providers as gatekeepers in the Malaysian public healthcare system.影响初级医疗服务提供者在马来西亚公共医疗系统中作为“守门人”角色的因素。
Malays Fam Physician. 2014 Dec 31;9(3):2-11. eCollection 2014.
2
Pathways of healthcare utilisation in patients with suspected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study.疑似青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者的医疗保健利用途径:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 7;15:500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1152-1.
3
Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive.德国从全科医疗向专科医生的转诊:如果全科医生是转诊的发起者,患者的体验会更积极。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 19;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-5.
4
A network analysis of patient referrals in two district health systems in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚两个地区卫生系统中患者转诊的网络分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 26;36(2):162-175. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa138.
5
Which Medical Institution Should Perform Gatekeeping in Rural China? Results from a Cross-Sectional Study.中国农村应由哪个医疗机构进行守门人服务?一项横断面研究的结果。
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Jan;79(1):e10-e17. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111824. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
Primary care physicians in Israel: self-perception of their role in the healthcare system and policy makers' and patients' perception of them as gatekeepers.以色列的初级保健医生:他们对自身在医疗保健系统中角色的自我认知以及政策制定者和患者对他们作为守门人的认知。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Dec;3(12):893-7.
7
Study of self-referral factors in the three-level healthcare delivery system, Kashan, Iran, 2000.2000年伊朗卡尚三级医疗服务体系中的自我转诊因素研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2004 Oct-Dec;4(4):237. Epub 2004 Oct 14.
8
Accuracy of pediatric primary care providers' screening and referral for early childhood caries.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿龋齿的筛查及转诊的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):E82-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.e82.
9
Consultations at central hospitals: reasons and outcome of referrals from urban clinics in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.中心医院的会诊:津巴布韦布拉瓦约市城市诊所转诊的原因及结果
Cent Afr J Med. 1998 May;44(5):121-5.
10
Patient desire and reasons for specialist referral in a gatekeeper-model managed care plan.在守门人模式管理式医疗计划中患者寻求专科转诊的意愿及原因。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jun;6(6):669-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Gatekeepers in the health financing scheme: Assessment of knowledge, attitude, practices, and participation of Malaysian private general practitioners in the PeKa B40 scheme.医保融资计划中的把关人:评估马来西亚私人全科医生对 PeKa B40 计划的知识、态度、实践和参与情况。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 17;18(10):e0292516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292516. eCollection 2023.
2
Analysis of costs and utilization of ambulance services in the ministry of health facilities, Malaysia.马来西亚卫生部救护车服务的成本和利用情况分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0276632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276632. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative performance of public and private primary care service delivery in Malaysia: An analysis of findings from QUALICOPC.马来西亚公立和私立基层医疗服务提供的比较绩效:QUALICOPC 研究结果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276480. eCollection 2022.
4
Age, sex and primary care setting differences in patients' perception of community healthcare seeking behaviour towards health services.年龄、性别和初级保健环境对患者对健康服务的社区卫生保健寻求行为的认知差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 21;14(10):e0224260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224260. eCollection 2019.
5
The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition.《中国广东省守门人制度对初级保健质量的影响:使用初级保健评估工具-成人版的横断面研究》
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0982-z.
6
The challenging task of gatekeeping.把关的艰巨任务。
Malays Fam Physician. 2014 Dec 31;9(3):1. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in physician referrals in the United States, 1999-2009.1999 - 2009年美国医生转诊趋势。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):163-70. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.722.
2
The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature.把关效应:文献系统综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Mar;29(1):28-38. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.537015. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
Interpretations of referral appropriateness by senior health managers in five PCT areas in England: a qualitative investigation.英格兰五个初级保健信托区的高级卫生管理人员对转诊适宜性的解读:一项定性研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Jun;19(3):182-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025684.
4
Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care.改善从初级保健向二级保健门诊转诊的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD005471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005471.pub2.
5
Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants.基层医疗医生专科转诊决策:患者、医生及医疗保健系统的决定因素
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05284110.
6
A new instrument to measure appropriateness of services in primary care.一种用于衡量初级保健服务适宜性的新仪器。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):133-40. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh029.
7
Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?美国的初级保健:初级保健守门与转诊:有效过滤器还是失败的试验?
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):692-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.692.
8
Comparison of specialty referral rates in the United Kingdom and the United States: retrospective cohort analysis.英国和美国专科转诊率的比较:回顾性队列分析。
BMJ. 2002 Aug 17;325(7360):370-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.370.
9
Gatekeeping: a challenge in the management of primary care physicians.
J Manag Med. 2001;15(4-5):283-98. doi: 10.1108/02689230110403795.
10
Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature?全科医生转诊率的差异:我们能从文献中学到什么?
Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):462-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.462.