Suppr超能文献

联合内镜超声和支气管内超声细针抽吸术评估纵隔淋巴结。

Combined endoscopic ultrasonography and endobronchial ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration for evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.

Department of Pneumology, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(Suppl 1):S9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endobronchial ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), is an accurate technique for evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) and stadification of lung cancer. The aims of the study are to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of the combined technique compared with mediastinoscopy for the diagnosis of MLN.

DESIGN AND METHODS

All patients with suspected malignant MLN and/or lung lesion identified by positron emission tomography-computed tomography underwent combined EUS-EBUS-FNA. The combined procedure was performed in outpatients under general anesthesia for EUS and sedation by intravenous midazolam for EBUS when performed separately, using linear-array echoendoscopes. The MLN were punctured during the EUS and EBUS-FNA procedures with a 22 gauge needle.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent consecutively EUS and EBUS-FNA between September 2011 and November 2013 (8 women, 26 men, mean age of 65.9 year, range: 51-83). Combined EUS-EBUS-FNA was performed in a single time procedure in 26 patients (mean time 50 min) and in two different times in eight patients (mean delay 3 days). Twenty-five malignant and 9 inflammatory lesions were diagnosed. Mediastinoscopy was performed in nine patients and confirmed in eight patients the initial combined EUS-EBUS-FNA diagnosis. The diagnosis was obtained in 91.2% with EUS-FNA, 70.6% with EBUS-FNA and 97% when combined procedure was performed. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of EUS-EBUS-FNA for diagnosing malignancy were 96.5%, 100%, 100% and 90% respectively. No complications related to the procedure were observed.

CONCLUSION

Combined EUS-EBUS-FNA represents an accurate technique in the diagnosis of MLN, can be done in a single time procedure and has the advantage of being less invasive than mediastinoscopy.

摘要

目的

内镜超声检查(EUS)和支气管内超声引导下细针抽吸术(EBUS-FNA)是评估纵隔淋巴结(MLN)和肺癌分期的准确技术。本研究的目的是评估与纵隔镜检查相比,联合技术诊断 MLN 的可行性和疗效。

设计和方法

所有经正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)怀疑恶性 MLN 和/或肺部病变的患者均接受 EUS-EBUS-FNA 联合检查。在全身麻醉下,门诊进行 EUS 检查,EUS 完成后单独使用静脉注射咪达唑仑镇静,行 EBUS-FNA,使用线性超声内镜。在 EUS 和 EBUS-FNA 过程中,使用 22 号针穿刺 MLN。

结果

2011 年 9 月至 2013 年 11 月期间,34 例患者连续进行了 EUS 和 EBUS-FNA(8 名女性,26 名男性,平均年龄 65.9 岁,范围:51-83)。26 例患者在一次操作中进行了联合 EUS-EBUS-FNA(平均时间 50 分钟),8 例患者分两次操作(平均间隔 3 天)。25 例恶性和 9 例炎症性病变得到诊断。9 例患者行纵隔镜检查,8 例患者证实了初始联合 EUS-EBUS-FNA 诊断。EUS-FNA 诊断率为 91.2%,EBUS-FNA 诊断率为 70.6%,联合操作诊断率为 97%。EUS-EBUS-FNA 诊断恶性肿瘤的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 96.5%、100%、100%和 90%。未观察到与该操作相关的并发症。

结论

EUS-EBUS-FNA 联合检查是一种准确的 MLN 诊断技术,可在一次操作中进行,且比纵隔镜检查具有侵袭性小的优势。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验