Suppr超能文献

痴呆的诊断:临床病理相关性

Diagnosis of dementia: clinicopathologic correlations.

作者信息

Boller F, Lopez O L, Moossy J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Neurology. 1989 Jan;39(1):76-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.1.76.

Abstract

Based on 54 demented patients consecutively autopsied at the University of Pittsburgh, we studied the accuracy of clinicians in predicting the pathologic diagnosis. Thirty-nine patients (72.2%) had Alzheimer's disease, while 15 (27.7%) had other CNS diseases (four multi-infarct dementia; three Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; two thalamic and subcortical gliosis; three Parkinson's disease; one progressive supranuclear palsy; one Huntington's disease; and one unclassified). Two neurologists independently reviewed the clinical records of each patient without knowledge of the patient's identity or clinical or pathologic diagnoses; each clinician reached a clinical diagnosis based on criteria derived from those of the NINCDS/ADRDA. In 34 (63%) cases both clinicians were correct, in nine (17%) one was correct, and in 11 (20%) neither was correct. These results show that in patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia, the etiology cannot be accurately predicted during life.

摘要

基于匹兹堡大学连续尸检的54例痴呆患者,我们研究了临床医生预测病理诊断的准确性。39例患者(72.2%)患有阿尔茨海默病,而15例(27.7%)患有其他中枢神经系统疾病(4例多发梗死性痴呆;3例克雅氏病;2例丘脑和皮质下胶质增生;3例帕金森病;1例进行性核上性麻痹;1例亨廷顿病;1例未分类)。两名神经科医生在不知道患者身份、临床或病理诊断的情况下独立查阅了每位患者的临床记录;每位临床医生根据源自NINCDS/ADRDA标准的标准做出临床诊断。在34例(63%)病例中,两名临床医生均诊断正确,9例(17%)中1名诊断正确,11例(20%)中两名均诊断错误。这些结果表明,对于临床诊断为痴呆的患者,生前无法准确预测其病因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验