Chittem Jyothi, Sajjan Girija S, Varma Kanumuri Madhu
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, GSL Dental College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):369-73. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.164034.
There is a growing interest in chemomechanical excavation (papain) in permanent molar teeth. There are several studies dealing with primary molar teeth.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of conventional method and Carie-care (chemomechanical method) on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and the type of failure of an adhesive system to caries-affected dentin of permanent molar teeth.
Twenty permanent molar teeth with carious lesions extending into the dentin were selected. Through the center of the carious lesion, teeth were sectioned mesiodistally and divided into two groups based on the method of caries excavation (conventional and chemomechanical method). The time required for the completion of excavation procedure was noted. Samples were again divided into two subgroups in each according to the method of restoration (Ketac N100 and Filtek Z350 composite). The bonded interface was subjected to μSBS testing in a universal testing machine. Fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope, and representative specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope for the type of failure.
It was achieved with unpaired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test at 5% level of significance.
The μSBS values of Carie-care groups were similar to that of the conventional method. The μSBSs of resin composite were significantly (P < 0.001) more than that of resin glass ionomer bonded irrespective of the method of caries excavation.
A papain-based chemomechanical agent can be used safely as a method for caries removal when employing conventional adhesive systems.
人们对恒牙磨牙的化学机械去龋(木瓜蛋白酶)兴趣日增。已有多项研究涉及乳牙磨牙。
本研究旨在评估传统方法和龋齿护理法(化学机械法)对恒牙磨牙龋损牙本质上黏结系统的微剪切黏结强度(μSBS)及破坏类型的影响。
选取20颗龋损已累及牙本质的恒牙磨牙。通过龋损中心将牙齿近远中向剖开,并根据去龋方法(传统法和化学机械法)分为两组。记录完成去龋操作所需时间。根据修复方法(Ketac N100和Filtek Z350复合树脂),每组样本再分为两个亚组。在万能试验机上对黏结界面进行μSBS测试。在体视显微镜下检查断裂面,并在扫描电子显微镜下检查代表性标本的破坏类型。
采用不成对t检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验,显著性水平为5%。
龋齿护理组的μSBS值与传统方法相似。无论去龋方法如何,树脂复合材料的μSBS均显著高于树脂玻璃离子水门汀黏结剂(P < 0.001)。
在使用传统黏结系统时,基于木瓜蛋白酶的化学机械剂可安全用作去龋方法。