• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像中央型腰椎管狭窄症形态学分级的观察者间和观察者内一致性。

Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ; National Advisory Unit on Spinal Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Neurosurgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2015 Oct;5(5):406-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1551651. Epub 2015 May 6.

DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1551651
PMID:26430595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4577324/
Abstract

Study Design Validation study of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective To evaluate and validate the inter- and intraobserver agreement of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging between neurosurgeons and radiologists. Methods Two neurosurgeons and two radiologists independently assessed the morphological grading of lumbar spinal stenosis on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging of 84 patients. Inter- and intrarater agreements were calculated by comparing the observers' evaluations level to level on the grading method. The results of both clinicians were compared with the assessment of both radiologists. Results On axial magnetic resonance images, 189 lumbar disk levels were evaluated for the grade of stenosis. The interobserver agreement between the clinicians was substantial. The interobserver agreement between clinician 1 and both radiologists was substantial, and it was moderate between clinician 2 and both radiologists. The clinicians' intraobserver agreement was almost perfect, and the radiologists' intraobserver agreement was substantial. Conclusions The interobserver agreement of this morphological grading for lumbar spinal stenosis was high between both the clinicians and radiologists, whereas the intraobserver agreement was almost perfect. Experienced clinicians may safely evaluate lumbar magnetic resonance images using this morphological grading for central lumbar spinal stenosis.

摘要

研究设计

一种用于中央型腰椎椎管狭窄症的形态学分级系统的验证研究。目的:评估和验证神经外科医生和放射科医生在磁共振成像上对中央型腰椎椎管狭窄症的形态学分级系统的观察者内和观察者间一致性。方法:两名神经外科医生和两名放射科医生独立评估了 84 例患者的预处理磁共振成像的腰椎椎管狭窄症的形态学分级。通过比较观察者在分级方法上的评估水平来计算观察者内和观察者间的一致性。将两位临床医生的结果与两位放射科医生的评估结果进行比较。结果:在轴向磁共振图像上,评估了 189 个腰椎间盘水平的狭窄程度。临床医生之间的观察者间一致性较高。临床医生 1 与两位放射科医生之间的观察者间一致性较高,而临床医生 2 与两位放射科医生之间的观察者间一致性为中度。临床医生的观察者内一致性几乎为完美,放射科医生的观察者内一致性为高。结论:该形态学分级系统对腰椎椎管狭窄症的观察者间一致性在临床医生和放射科医生之间均较高,而观察者内一致性几乎为完美。有经验的临床医生可以使用这种用于中央型腰椎椎管狭窄症的形态学分级来安全地评估腰椎磁共振图像。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0f/4577324/d9377d29fd98/10-1055-s-0035-1551651-i1400145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0f/4577324/d9377d29fd98/10-1055-s-0035-1551651-i1400145-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b0f/4577324/d9377d29fd98/10-1055-s-0035-1551651-i1400145-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.磁共振成像中央型腰椎管狭窄症形态学分级的观察者间和观察者内一致性。
Global Spine J. 2015 Oct;5(5):406-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1551651. Epub 2015 May 6.
2
Observer variability in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis severity on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to cross-sectional spinal canal area.磁共振成像评估腰椎管狭窄严重程度时观察者间的变异性及其与椎管横截面积的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 May 15;27(10):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200205150-00014.
3
A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.一种用于腰椎侧隐窝狭窄的实用 MRI 分级系统。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1095-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772.
4
Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.术前 MRI 检查在腰椎椎管狭窄症患者中的可靠性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04949-4.
5
Using Magnetic Resonance Myelography to Improve Interobserver Agreement in the Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis and Root Compression.使用磁共振脊髓造影改善腰椎管狭窄症和神经根受压评估中的观察者间一致性。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):198-203. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.198. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Correlation between MRI Grading System and Surgical Findings for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.腰椎椎间孔狭窄症的MRI分级系统与手术发现之间的相关性
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Jul;60(4):465-470. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.1010.004. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.腰椎磁共振成像结果的评分者间和评分者内一致性:不同退变情况存在显著差异。
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
8
A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.基于斜矢状位图像的颈椎椎间孔狭窄实用 MRI 分级系统。
Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120515. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
9
A new comprehensive MRI classification and grading system for lumbosacral central and lateral stenosis: clinical application and comparison with previous systems.一种新的腰骶中央和外侧狭窄的综合 MRI 分类和分级系统:临床应用及与既往系统的比较。
Radiol Med. 2024 Jan;129(1):93-106. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01741-3. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?腰椎管狭窄症的MRI评估:快速视觉评估与面积测量一样好吗?
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1320-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3248-4. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Axial T1-weighted imaging of the lumbar spine: a redundancy or an asset?腰椎轴向 T1 加权成像:冗余还是资产?
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Jun;53(6):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04522-1. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.两种不同的腰椎中央管狭窄症分级系统的临床有效性:Schizas 和 Lee 分类系统。
PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0233633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233633. eCollection 2020.
3
Major Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Total Spine MRI Performed in the Emergency Department at a Major Academic Medical Center.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.比较X-Stop与微创减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):514-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000798.
2
Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.腰椎管狭窄症中微创减压术与X-stop植入术的对比:一项随机对照多中心研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):77-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000691.
3
Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology.
主要放射学和临床结果的全脊柱 MRI 在急诊部在一个主要的学术医疗中心。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6578. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?使用管状牵开器系统进行脊柱减压后,极度狭窄和非极度狭窄患者在疼痛、功能或并发症方面是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Feb;478(2):348-356. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001004.
5
[Reconsideration of lumbar spinal stenosis].[腰椎管狭窄症的再认识]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):789-794. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904027.
6
Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.退行性腰椎管狭窄症:磁共振成像参数的阅片者间及阅片者内一致性
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4667-1. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
腰椎间盘命名法:第2.0版:北美脊柱协会、美国脊柱放射学会和美国神经放射学会联合特别工作组的建议
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2525-45. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?腰椎管狭窄症的MRI评估:快速视觉评估与面积测量一样好吗?
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1320-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3248-4. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
5
Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.一种新的实用 MRI 方法评估中央型腰椎椎管狭窄的临床相关性研究
Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120180. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120180. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
6
Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac.腰椎管狭窄症的决策:关于硬脊膜囊形态学影响的一项调查
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):98-101. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27420.
7
Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.腰椎间盘假体候选者 MRI 检查结果的可靠性。
Neuroradiology. 2012 Jul;54(7):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
8
Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? A magnetic resonance imaging study.脊柱狭窄评估是否依赖于层面方位?一项磁共振成像研究。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S760-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1857-8. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression.腰椎管狭窄症患者的残疾程度与 MRI 表现的相关性:109 例减压手术患者的前瞻性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):204-10. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566150. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
10
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.