Suppr超能文献

增强农村学龄儿童哮喘自我管理能力:一项随机对照试验

Enhancing Asthma Self-Management in Rural School-Aged Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Horner Sharon D, Brown Adama, Brown Sharon A, Rew D Lynn

机构信息

School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2016 Jun;32(3):260-8. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12150. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the effects of 2 modes of delivering an asthma educational intervention on health outcomes and asthma self-management in school-aged children who live in rural areas.

METHODS

Longitudinal design with data collected 4 times over 12 months. The target sample was composed of children in grades 2-5 who had a provider diagnosis of asthma. Elementary schools were stratified into high or low socioeconomic status based on student enrollment in the free or reduced-cost lunch program. Schools were then randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms: in-school asthma class, asthma day camp, or the attention-control group.

FINDINGS

Sample retention was good (87.7%) and equally distributed by study arm. Improvements in emergency department visits and office visits were related to attending either the asthma class or asthma day camp. Asthma severity significantly decreased in both asthma treatment groups. Other factors such as hospitalizations, parent asthma management, and child asthma management improved for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both asthma class and asthma day camp yielded significant reductions in asthma severity. There were reductions in the emergency department and office visits for the 2 asthma arms, and hospitalizations declined significantly for all groups. Asthma self-management also improved in all groups, while it was somewhat higher in the asthma arms. This may be due to the attention being drawn to asthma management by study participation and the action of completing questionnaires about asthma management, asthma symptoms, and health outcomes.

摘要

目的

测试两种哮喘教育干预模式对农村地区学龄儿童健康结局及哮喘自我管理的影响。

方法

采用纵向设计,在12个月内收集4次数据。目标样本由2至5年级经医疗服务提供者诊断为哮喘的儿童组成。小学根据参加免费或减价午餐计划的学生人数分为高或低社会经济地位组。然后将学校随机分配到3个治疗组之一:校内哮喘课程组、哮喘日间营组或注意力控制组。

结果

样本保留率良好(87.7%),且在各研究组中分布均匀。急诊就诊和门诊就诊次数的改善与参加哮喘课程或哮喘日间营有关。两个哮喘治疗组的哮喘严重程度均显著降低。所有组的其他因素,如住院次数、家长哮喘管理和儿童哮喘管理均有所改善。

结论

哮喘课程组和哮喘日间营组的哮喘严重程度均显著降低。两个哮喘治疗组的急诊就诊和门诊就诊次数均有所减少,所有组的住院次数均显著下降。所有组的哮喘自我管理也有所改善,而哮喘治疗组的改善程度略高。这可能是由于参与研究引起了对哮喘管理的关注,以及填写有关哮喘管理、哮喘症状和健康结局问卷的行为所致。

相似文献

1
Enhancing Asthma Self-Management in Rural School-Aged Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Rural Health. 2016 Jun;32(3):260-8. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12150. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
2
The effects of self-management education for school-age children on asthma morbidity: a systematic review.
J Sch Nurs. 2011 Aug;27(4):282-92. doi: 10.1177/1059840511403003. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
3
Evaluation and sustainability of the healthy learners asthma initiative.
J Sch Health. 2006 Aug;76(6):276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00112.x.
4
Evaluating the effect of an asthma self-management intervention for rural families.
J Asthma. 2014 Mar;51(2):168-77. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.855785. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Successful school-based intervention for inner-city children with persistent asthma.
J Asthma. 2004 Jun;41(4):445-53. doi: 10.1081/jas-120033987.
6
Screening for asthma: results from a rural cohort.
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2006 Oct-Dec;29(4):205-24. doi: 10.1080/01460860601098575.
7
Evaluation of an education program for elementary school children with asthma.
J Asthma. 2003;40(5):523-33. doi: 10.1081/jas-120018785.
9
Kickin' Asthma: school-based asthma education in an urban community.
J Sch Health. 2008 Dec;78(12):655-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00362.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical integrated healthcare prevention and management of children's health quality of respiratory functions: a systematic review.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Sep 4;3(2):e000477. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000477. eCollection 2025.
4
Effectiveness of Community-Based Nursing Intervention for Asthmatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Oct;52(10):2025-2035. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i10.13840.
6
Effect of asthma education on health outcomes in children: a systematic review.
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Dec;107(12):1100-1105. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323496. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
7
Meta-Analysis of Adherence Promotion Interventions in Pediatric Asthma.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;46(10):1195-1212. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab057.
8
School-based self-management interventions for asthma among primary school children: a systematic review.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Apr 1;31(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00230-2.
9
Impact of Nurse-Led Asthma Intervention on Child Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
J Sch Nurs. 2022 Feb;38(1):84-97. doi: 10.1177/10598405211003303. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Examining Social Determinants of Health in Childhood Asthma Management.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2020 Sep/Oct;34(5):222-230. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000542.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluating the effect of an asthma self-management intervention for rural families.
J Asthma. 2014 Mar;51(2):168-77. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.855785. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
4
Epidemiology of asthma in the United States.
Nurs Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;48(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
6
A population-based study of health service deficits for US adults with asthma.
J Asthma. 2011 Nov;48(9):931-44. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.619023. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
7
Pesticides and asthma.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;11(2):90-6. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283445939.
8
9
Childhood asthma in a rural environment: implications for clinical nurse specialist practice.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):192-8; quiz 199-200. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000311708.40190.ca.
10
Preliminary evidence for an emerging nonmetropolitan mortality penalty in the United States.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1470-2. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123778. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验