Siu Gilman K H, Chen Jonathan H K, Ng T K, Lee Rodney A, Fung Kitty S C, To Sabrina W C, Wong Barry K C, Cheung Sherman, Wong Ivan W F, Tam Marble M P, Lee Swing S W, Yam W C
Department of Health technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0139728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139728. eCollection 2015.
A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance and the time to identifcation of the Verigene Blood Culture Test, the BC-GP and BC-GN assays, to identify both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their drug resistance determinants directly from positive blood cultures collected in Hong Kong.
A total of 364 blood cultures were prospectively collected from four public hospitals, in which 114 and 250 cultures yielded Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and were tested with the BC-GP and BC-GN assay respectively. The overall identification agreement for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were 89.6% and 90.5% in monomicrobial cultures and 62.5% and 53.6% in polymicrobial cultures, respectively. The sensitivities for most genus/species achieved at least 80% except Enterococcus spp. (60%), K.oxytoca (0%), K.pneumoniae (69.2%), whereas the specificities for all targets ranged from 98.9% to 100%. Of note, 50% (7/14) cultures containing K.pneumoniae that were missed by the BC-GN assay were subsequently identified as K.variicola. Approximately 5.5% (20/364) cultures contained non-target organisms, of which Aeromonas spp. accounted for 25% and are of particular concern. For drug resistance determination, the Verigene test showed 100% sensitivity for identification of MRSA, VRE and carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter, and 84.4% for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae based on the positive detection of mecA, vanA, blaOXA and blaCTXM respectively.
Overall, the Verigene test provided acceptable accuracy for identification of bacteria and resistance markers with a range of turnaround time 40.5 to 99.2 h faster than conventional methods in our region.
开展了一项多中心研究,以评估Verigene血培养检测、BC-GP和BC-GN检测的诊断性能及鉴定时间,这些检测可直接从香港采集的阳性血培养物中鉴定革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌及其耐药决定因素。
前瞻性地从四家公立医院收集了364份血培养物,其中114份和250份培养物分别培养出革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌,并分别用BC-GP和BC-GN检测进行检测。在单一微生物培养物中,革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的总体鉴定一致性分别为89.6%和90.5%,在多微生物培养物中分别为62.5%和53.6%。除肠球菌属(60%)、产酸克雷伯菌(0%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(69.2%)外,大多数属/种的敏感性至少达到80%,而所有靶点的特异性范围为98.9%至100%。值得注意的是,BC-GN检测遗漏的50%(7/14)含有肺炎克雷伯菌的培养物随后被鉴定为Variicola克雷伯菌。约5.5%(20/364)的培养物含有非目标微生物,其中气单胞菌属占25%,尤其值得关注。对于耐药性测定,Verigene检测基于分别对mecA、vanA、blaOXA和blaCTXM的阳性检测,对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、耐万古霉素肠球菌和耐碳青霉烯不动杆菌的鉴定敏感性为100%,对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定敏感性为84.4%。
总体而言,Verigene检测在鉴定细菌和耐药标志物方面提供了可接受的准确性,周转时间比我们地区的传统方法快40.5至99.2小时。