Kramer Gregory D, Werner Liliana, MacLean Kyle, Farukhi Aabid, Gardiner Gareth L, Mamalis Nick
From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1738-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.017.
To evaluate the stability and capsular bag opacification of a smooth or a patterned silicone protective membrane implanted in the bag with secondary placement of an intraocular lens (IOL).
John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Experimental study.
Twelve New Zealand rabbits had bilateral implantation of a protective membrane and an IOL or an IOL alone. Three groups of 8 eyes each received the IOL and the smooth protective membrane, the IOL and the patterned membrane, or the IOL alone. Slitlamp examination was performed weekly for 4 weeks. The rabbits were then humanely killed and their globes enucleated. Capsular bag opacification was scored based on the Miyake-Apple view, and the eyes underwent histopathology.
At 4 weeks, the mean central posterior capsule opacification (PCO) score was 0.28 ± 0.32 (SD) in all eyes with a protective membrane and 2.08 ± 1.28 in eyes with the IOL alone (P < .00001, Student t test). Peripheral PCO and Soemmerring ring formation were also significantly less in eyes with the protective membrane. Histopathologically, the posterior capsules were relatively clear in most IOLs with the protective membrane. The smooth and patterned protective membranes showed a significant difference in overall capsular bag opacification formation compared with the IOLs without the membrane.
The circular geometry of the protective membrane led to expansion of the capsular bag and appeared to prevent capsular bag opacification. Further studies are warranted to assess whether the pattern on the device's posterior surface further enhances this effect.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
评估在囊袋内二次植入人工晶状体(IOL)时,植入光滑或有图案的硅酮保护膜后的稳定性及囊袋混浊情况。
美国犹他州盐湖城犹他大学约翰·A·莫兰眼科中心。
实验研究。
12只新西兰兔双眼植入保护膜和IOL或仅植入IOL。每组8只眼,分别接受IOL和光滑保护膜、IOL和有图案的膜或仅IOL。连续4周每周进行裂隙灯检查。然后对兔实施安乐死并摘除眼球。根据三浦-苹果视图对囊袋混浊进行评分,并对眼球进行组织病理学检查。
4周时,所有植入保护膜的眼中央后囊混浊(PCO)平均评分为0.28±0.32(标准差),仅植入IOL的眼中PCO评分为2.08±1.28(P<0.00001,学生t检验)。植入保护膜的眼中周边PCO和索默林环形成也明显较少。组织病理学检查显示,大多数植入保护膜的IOL后囊相对清晰。与未植入膜的IOL相比,光滑和有图案的保护膜在总体囊袋混浊形成方面存在显著差异。
保护膜的圆形几何形状导致囊袋扩张,似乎可预防囊袋混浊。有必要进一步研究评估该装置后表面的图案是否能进一步增强这种效果。
无作者对文中提及的任何材料或方法拥有财务或专利权益。