• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在基因医学中对患者亲属的责任:ABC诉圣乔治医疗保健国民保健服务信托基金案[2015] EWHC 1394 (QB)

DOCTORS' LIABILITY TO THE PATIENT'S RELATIVES IN GENETIC MEDICINE: ABC V St George's Healthcare NHS trust[2015] EWHC 1394 (QB).

作者信息

Gilbar Roy, Foster Charles

机构信息

School of Law, Netanya Academic College, Netanya, Israel School of Law, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):112-23. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv037. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwv037
PMID:26433012
Abstract

This comment analyses the recent High Court's decision in ABC v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust. In this case, the court struck out a claim brought by a patient's daughter against her father's doctors for their failure to warn her of his hereditary disease. The claimant argued that the doctors' failure caused her harm and violated her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. It is argued in this comment that the judge should have accepted the claimant's application.

摘要

本评论分析了高等法院最近在ABC诉圣乔治医疗保健国民保健服务信托案中的判决。在该案件中,法院驳回了一名患者女儿对其父亲的医生提起的诉讼,该诉讼指控医生未告知她其父亲的遗传病。原告辩称,医生的不作为给她造成了伤害,并侵犯了她根据《欧洲人权公约》所享有的权利。本评论认为,法官本应接受原告的申请。

相似文献

1
DOCTORS' LIABILITY TO THE PATIENT'S RELATIVES IN GENETIC MEDICINE: ABC V St George's Healthcare NHS trust[2015] EWHC 1394 (QB).医生在基因医学中对患者亲属的责任:ABC诉圣乔治医疗保健国民保健服务信托基金案[2015] EWHC 1394 (QB)
Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):112-23. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv037. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
2
Confidentiality in medicine: how far should doctors prioritise the confidentiality of the individual they are treating?医学保密:医生应在多大程度上优先考虑他们正在治疗的个体的保密性?
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Oct;94(1116):596-600. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136038. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Is there a New Duty to Warn Family Members in English Medical Law? ABC V ST George's Healthcare NHS Trust and Others [2020] EWHC 4551.英国医疗法中是否存在向家庭成员发出警告的新义务?ABC诉圣乔治医疗保健国民保健服务信托基金及其他人[2020] EWHC 4551
Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 11;29(2):359-372. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwab006.
4
Cousins, Genetic Diagnosis and Liability of Clinicians: Smith & Another V University of Leicester NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 817 (QB).
Med Law Rev. 2017 Nov 1;25(4):672-683. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx032.
5
What should the law say about disclosure of genetic information to relatives?法律对于向亲属披露基因信息应该作何规定?
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(2):373-90.
6
Should doctors have a legal duty to warn relatives of their genetic risks?医生是否应承担向亲属告知其遗传风险的法律责任?
Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2133-2135. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32941-1. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?家族遗传风险:我们如何在保护患者隐私的同时,更好地向亲属进行适当的风险披露?
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):504-507. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105229. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
The argument against a physician's duty to warn for genetic diseases: the conflicts created by Safer v. Estate of Pack.
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(2):437-53.
9
It's arrived! Relational Autonomy Comes to Court: ABC v ST George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2017] EWCA 336.它来了!关系自主性进入法庭:ABC诉圣乔治医疗保健国民保健服务信托基金案[2017]英国上诉法院336号判决
Med Law Rev. 2018 Feb 1;26(1):125-133. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx044.
10
The Right to Sue for Non-Communication or Delay in the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases.
J Law Med. 2016;24(2):275-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing expectations, rights, and duties in large-scale genomics initiatives: a European comparison.管理大规模基因组学计划中的期望、权利和义务:欧洲比较。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Feb;31(2):142-147. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01247-y. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?家族遗传风险:我们如何在保护患者隐私的同时,更好地向亲属进行适当的风险披露?
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):504-507. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105229. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
"It would be so much easier": health system-led genetic risk notification-feasibility and acceptability of cascade screening in an integrated system.
“这将容易得多”:卫生系统主导的遗传风险告知——综合系统中级联筛查的可行性与可接受性
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00412-z. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Reasonable expectations of privacy in non-disclosure of familial genetic risk: What is it reasonable to expect?对不披露家族遗传风险的合理隐私期望:期望什么才合理?
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Alerting relatives about heritable risks: the limits of confidentiality.告知亲属遗传性风险:保密的局限性。
BMJ. 2018 Apr 5;361:k1409. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1409.
6
Genetic diseases and information to relatives: practical and ethical issues for professionals after introduction of a legal framework in France.遗传性疾病及其相关信息向亲属告知:法国引入法律框架后的专业人员所面临的实际问题与伦理问题。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jun;26(6):786-795. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0103-9. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals.使用家属信传达遗传风险的局限性与陷阱:一项针对患者和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):689-701. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0164-x. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Exploring the potential duty of care in clinical genomics under UK law.探索英国法律下临床基因组学中潜在的注意义务。
Med Law Int. 2017 Sep;17(3):158-182. doi: 10.1177/0968533217721966. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
Genetic Transmission of Disease: A Legal Harm?疾病的基因传播:一种法律伤害?
Health Care Anal. 2016 Sep;24(3):228-45. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0306-y.