• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性A型主动脉夹层破裂患者手术死亡率的决定因素

Determinants of Operative Mortality in Patients With Ruptured Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

作者信息

Afifi Rana O, Sandhu Harleen K, Leake Samuel S, Rice Rob D, Azizzadeh Ali, Charlton-Ouw Kristofer M, Nguyen Tom C, Miller Charles C, Estrera Anthony L, Safi Hazim J

机构信息

University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.

University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.007
PMID:26433520
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency associated with high mortality and morbidity. We analyzed our 15-year experience in the management of ruptured ATAAD (rATAAD) and non-rATAAD to determine the predictors of early and late mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed all cases with ATAAD between 1999 and 2014. Patients were grouped into rATAAD and non-rATAAD based on intraoperative confirmation. Clinical data on preoperative characteristics and in-hospital and long-term outcomes were analyzed to determine risk factors for early and long-term mortality. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log rank statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 489 total ATAAD repairs, 75 patients (15.3%) had rATAAD. The rATAAD patients were older compared with non-rATAAD (64.4 ± 16.2 versus 57.3 ± 14.2 years, respectively; p = 0.0001) and commonly female (31 of 75 [41.3%] versus 107 of 414 [25.9%], respectively; p = 0.006). Early mortality was higher among rATAAD patients that among non-rATAAD patients (19 of 75 [25.3%] versus 48 of 414 [11.6%], respectively; p = 0.002); predictors included rupture, age, malperfusion syndrome, and coronary artery disease. Patients aged 70 years or more with malperfusion syndrome had a 7.7-fold risk of 24-hour mortality (p = 0.0003) that was augmented by rATAAD (p = 0.004). Long-term survival was lower among rATAAD than non-rATAAD (57.4% versus 78.2%, respectively, at 5 years; p < 0.0001); independent predictors included rupture (p = 0.01), low glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.001), and high-risk group (p = 0.004). These risk factors were used to construct a predictive model for estimating the probability of early mortality in ATAAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Rupture is associated with significantly higher mortality in ATAAD. This predictive model provides surgical risk assessment for early mortality after rATAAD. For acceptable surgical candidates, immediate aortic repair can provide favorable outcomes.

摘要

背景

急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)是一种与高死亡率和高发病率相关的外科急症。我们分析了我们在15年中对破裂性ATAAD(rATAAD)和非破裂性ATAAD的治疗经验,以确定早期和晚期死亡率的预测因素。

方法

我们回顾了1999年至2014年间所有ATAAD病例。根据术中确认情况将患者分为rATAAD组和非rATAAD组。分析术前特征、住院期间及长期预后的临床数据,以确定早期和长期死亡率的危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩统计分析生存率。

结果

在489例ATAAD修复手术中,75例(15.3%)为rATAAD。rATAAD患者比非rATAAD患者年龄更大(分别为64.4±16.2岁和57.3±14.2岁;p = 0.0001),且女性更为常见(75例中的31例[41.3%]和414例中的107例[25.9%],分别;p = 0.006)。rATAAD患者的早期死亡率高于非rATAAD患者(分别为75例中的19例[25.3%]和414例中的48例[11.6%];p = 0.002);预测因素包括破裂、年龄、灌注不良综合征和冠状动脉疾病。年龄70岁及以上且患有灌注不良综合征的患者24小时死亡率风险增加7.7倍(p = 0.0003),rATAAD会进一步增加该风险(p = 0.004)。rATAAD患者的长期生存率低于非rATAAD患者(5年时分别为57.4%和78.2%;p < 0.0001);独立预测因素包括破裂(p = 0.01)、低肾小球滤过率(p = 0.001)和高危组(p = 0.

相似文献

1
Determinants of Operative Mortality in Patients With Ruptured Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.急性A型主动脉夹层破裂患者手术死亡率的决定因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
Outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection after previous cardiac surgery.既往心脏手术后急性 A 型主动脉夹层的转归。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 May;89(5):1467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.015.
3
Outcomes of acute type a dissection repair before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary thoracic aortic surgery program.多学科胸主动脉外科项目实施前后急性 A 型夹层修复的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.085. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Emergency thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: clinical outcome.急诊胸腹主动脉瘤修复术:临床结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Sep;118(3):477-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70185-6.
5
A new predictive model for adverse outcomes after elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1233-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02678-3.
6
Octogenarians with uncomplicated acute type a aortic dissection benefit from emergency operation.80 岁以上无并发症的急性 a 型主动脉夹层患者受益于急诊手术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):851-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.066. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
7
Malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: An update from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层中的灌注不良:来自北欧急性 A 型主动脉夹层联合会的最新进展。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;157(4):1324-1333.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.134. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome: Data From the RENADA-RO Registry.A型急性主动脉综合征住院患者死亡的预测因素:RENADA-RO 注册研究的数据。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Sep;33(9):1348-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.02.016. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
Operative delay for peripheral malperfusion syndrome in acute type A aortic dissection: a long-term analysis.急性A型主动脉夹层周围灌注不良综合征的手术延迟:一项长期分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1288-95; discussion 1295-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 May 23.
10
Mortality in acute type A aortic dissection: validation of the Penn classification.急性 A 型主动脉夹层的死亡率:彭分类法的验证。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after open repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections in cannabis consumers.大麻使用者主动脉瘤和夹层开放修复术后的结果。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Aug 19;22:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.08.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Preoperative clinical characteristics and risk assessment in Sun's modified classification of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.术前临床特征与 Sun 改良 Stanford A 型主动脉夹层分类的风险评估。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04145-x.
3
A novel nomogram for predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute type A aortic dissection surgery: a retrospective study investigating the impact of ventilation duration on postoperative outcomes.
急性 A 型主动脉夹层手术后机械通气时间延长的新型列线图预测模型:一项探讨通气时间对术后结局影响的回顾性研究。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2392871. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2392871. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
The impact of age and sex on aortic dissection outcomes: a true controversy or lack of standardization?年龄和性别对主动脉夹层预后的影响:是真正的争议还是缺乏标准化?
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Nov;14(11):4223-4225. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2022-18.
5
Risk factors of pre-operational aortic rupture in acute and subacute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients.急性和亚急性 Stanford A 型主动脉夹层患者术前主动脉破裂的危险因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Dec;9(12):4979-4987. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.59.
6
Outcomes and management of type A intramural hematoma.A型壁内血肿的治疗结果与管理
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;5(4):317-27. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.07.06.
7
Surgical repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection in elderly patients: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者 Stanford A 型主动脉夹层的外科修复:一项当代系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;5(4):257-64. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.06.03.