Suppr超能文献

邻里密度对成人单词重复的影响。

Effects of Neighborhood Density on Adult Word Repetition.

作者信息

Freedman Skott E, Barlow Jessica A

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Ithaca College, USA.

School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, USA.

出版信息

Int J Engl Linguist. 2013 Apr 1;3(2):1-13. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v3n2p1.

Abstract

Presumable lexical competition has been found to result in higher perceptual accuracy for words with few versus many neighbors. Previous studies have typically only analyzed the lexical-semantic level, however. In order to also explore the possibility of phonological effects, a word repetition task was administered to 46 typical adults in which 80 stimuli differed only in neighborhood density. In contrast to previous studies, verbal responses were elicited in order to analyze productions holistically and segmentally at the phonological level. An additional error analysis examined differences in neighborhood density between target words and substitutions. Findings revealed that words with more neighbors recognition, and were more accurately repeated than those with fewer neighbors. When a target word was misperceived, its substitution tended to be higher in neighborhood density, unrelated to word frequency. In order to interpret these results, an account of lexical competition is re-visited with consideration of characteristics of the lexicon discovered using graph theory (Vitevitch, 2008).

摘要

据推测,词汇竞争已被发现会导致与邻居较少的词相比,邻居较多的词具有更高的感知准确性。然而,以往的研究通常只分析了词汇语义层面。为了探究语音效应的可能性,对46名典型成年人进行了一项单词重复任务,其中80个刺激仅在邻域密度上有所不同。与以往研究不同的是,引出了言语反应,以便在语音层面整体和分段地分析产出。一项额外的错误分析检查了目标词和替代词在邻域密度上的差异。研究结果表明,邻居较多的词比邻居较少的词更容易被识别,并且重复得更准确。当一个目标词被误认时,其替代词的邻域密度往往更高,与词频无关。为了解释这些结果,我们重新审视了词汇竞争的观点,并考虑了使用图论发现的词汇特征(维特维奇,2008年)。

相似文献

1
Effects of Neighborhood Density on Adult Word Repetition.
Int J Engl Linguist. 2013 Apr 1;3(2):1-13. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v3n2p1.
2
Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Ear Hear. 2001 Feb;22(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200102000-00001.
4
The impact of lexical factors on children's word-finding errors.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Jun;47(3):624-36. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/048).
5
Is the time course of lexical activation and competition in spoken word recognition affected by adult aging? An event-related potential (ERP) study.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
6
Many neighbors are not silent. fMRI evidence for global lexical activity in visual word recognition.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 22;9:423. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00423. eCollection 2015.
8
Word length and lexical competition: longer is the same as shorter.
Lang Speech. 2008;51(Pt 4):361-83. doi: 10.1177/0023830908099070.
9
The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):166-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03195952.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroanatomical structures supporting lexical diversity, sophistication, and phonological word features during discourse.
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:101961. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101961. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
Operationalization of Sign Language Phonological Similarity and its Effects on Lexical Access.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Jul 1;22(3):303-315. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx014.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lexicon and Phonology: Interactions in Language Acquisition.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002 Jan 1;33(1):24-37. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2002/003).
3
The influence of neighborhood density and word frequency on phoneme awareness in 2nd and 4th grades.
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;44(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
4
Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Sep;65(5):551-60. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq039. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
5
The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production.
Lang Cogn Process. 2006;21(6):760-770. doi: 10.1080/01690960500287196.
6
Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Aug;51(4):1042-54. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/076).
7
What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):408-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/030).
8
Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085).
9
Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production.
Cognition. 2007 Feb;102(2):219-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
10
The impact of lexical factors on children's word-finding errors.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Jun;47(3):624-36. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/048).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验