Goldrick Matthew, Rapp Brenda
Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Cognition. 2007 Feb;102(2):219-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
Theories of spoken word production generally assume a distinction between at least two types of phonological processes and representations: lexical phonological processes that recover relatively arbitrary aspects of word forms from long-term memory and post-lexical phonological processes that specify the predictable aspects of phonological representations. In this work we examine the spoken production of two brain-damaged individuals. We use their differential patterns of accuracy across the tasks of spoken naming and repetition to establish that they suffer from distinct deficits originating fairly selectively within lexical or post-lexical processes. Independent and detailed analyses of their spoken productions reveal contrasting patterns that provide clear support for a distinction between two types of phonological representations: those that lack syllabic and featural information and are sensitive to lexical factors such as lexical frequency and neighborhood density, and those that include syllabic and featural information and are sensitive to detailed properties of phonological structure such as phoneme frequency and syllabic constituency.
从长期记忆中恢复单词形式相对任意方面的词汇语音过程,以及指定语音表征可预测方面的词后语音过程。在这项研究中,我们考察了两名脑损伤个体的言语产出。我们利用他们在口语命名和重复任务中的不同准确率模式,来确定他们患有源自词汇或词后过程中相当选择性的不同缺陷。对他们言语产出的独立且详细的分析揭示了对比模式,这些模式为两类语音表征之间的区别提供了明确支持:一类缺乏音节和特征信息,且对词汇频率和邻域密度等词汇因素敏感;另一类包含音节和特征信息,且对语音结构的详细属性(如音素频率和音节成分)敏感。