Gamanagatti Shivanand, Rathinam Deepak, Rangarajan Krithika, Kumar Atin, Farooque Kamran, Sharma Vijay
Shivanand Gamanagatti, Deepak Rathinam, Krithika Rangarajan, Atin Kumar, Department of Radiology, JPNA Trauma Center, AllIndia Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
World J Radiol. 2015 Sep 28;7(9):253-65. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.253.
Spine fractures account for a large portion of musculoskeletal injuries worldwide. A classification of spine fractures is necessary in order to develop a common language for treatment indications and outcomes. Several classification systems have been developed based on injury anatomy or mechanisms of action, but they have demonstrated poor reliability, have yielded little prognostic information, and have not been widely used. For this reason, the Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen (AO) committee has classified thorocolumbar spine injuries based on the pathomorphological criteria into3 types (A: Compression; B: Distraction; C: Axial torque and rotational deformity). Each of these types is further divided into 3 groups and 3 subgroups reflecting progressive scale of morphological damage and the degree of instability. Because of its highly detailed sub classifications, the AO system has shown limited interobserver variability. It is similar to its predecessors in that it does not incorporate the patient's neurologic status.The need for a reliable, reproducible, clinically relevant, prognostic classification system with an optimal balance of ease of use and detail of injury description contributed to the development of a new classification system, the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS). The TLICS defines injury based on three clinical characteristics: injury morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status of the patient. The severity score offers prognostic information and is helpful in decision making about surgical vs nonsurgical management.
脊柱骨折在全球肌肉骨骼损伤中占很大比例。为了形成关于治疗指征和结果的通用语言,有必要对脊柱骨折进行分类。已经基于损伤解剖结构或作用机制开发了几种分类系统,但它们的可靠性较差,提供的预后信息很少,且未得到广泛应用。因此,骨科学内固定协会(AO)委员会根据病理形态学标准将胸腰椎损伤分为3种类型(A:压缩型;B:牵张型;C:轴向扭矩和旋转畸形型)。每种类型又进一步分为3组和3个亚组,反映形态学损伤的进展程度和不稳定程度。由于其亚分类非常详细,AO系统显示出观察者间的变异性有限。它与之前的系统类似,没有纳入患者的神经学状态。对一种可靠、可重复、临床相关、具有预后性的分类系统的需求,且该系统要在易用性和损伤描述细节之间达到最佳平衡,这促成了一种新的分类系统——胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)的发展。TLICS根据三个临床特征定义损伤:损伤形态、后韧带复合体的完整性以及患者的神经学状态。严重程度评分提供预后信息,有助于在手术与非手术治疗管理之间做出决策。