Srivastava Tripti K, Waghmare Lalitbhushan S, Mishra Ved Prakash, Rawekar Alka T, Quazi Nazli, Jagzape Arunita T
Professor, Department of Physiology, Professor & Head, Department of Medical Education, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (DU) , Sawangi(M), Wardha, India .
Professor, Department of Physiology, Dean, Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (DU) , Sawangi(M), Wardha, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):JC01-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15018.6323. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
Peer teaching is an effective tool to promote learning and retention of knowledge. By preparing to teach, students are encouraged to construct their own learning program, so that they can explain effectively to fellow learners. Peer teaching is introduced in present study to foster learning and pedagogical skills amongst first year medical under-graduates in physiology with a Hypothesis that teaching is linked to learning on part of the teacher.
Non-randomized, Interventional study, with mixed methods design. Cases experienced peer teaching whereas controls underwent tutorials for four consecutive classes. Quantitative Evaluation was done through pre/post test score analysis for Class average normalized gain and tests of significance, difference in average score in surprise class test after one month and percentage of responses in closed ended items of feedback questionnaire. Qualitative Evaluation was done through categorization of open ended items and coding of reflective statements.
The average pre and post test score was statistically significant within cases (p = 0.01) and controls (p = 0.023). The average post test scores was more for cases though not statistically significant. The class average normalized gain (g) for Tutorials was 49% and for peer teaching 53%. Surprise test had average scoring of 36 marks (out of 50) for controls and 41 marks for cases. Analysed section wise, the average score was better for Long answer question (LAQ) in cases. Section wise analysis suggested that through peer teaching, retention was better for descriptive answers as LAQ has better average score in cases. Feedback responses were predominantly positive for efficacy of peer teaching as a learning method. The reflective statements were sorted into reflection in action, reflection on action, claiming evidence, describing experience, and recognizing discrepancies.
Teaching can stimulate further learning as it involves interplay of three processes: metacognitive awareness; deliberate practice, and self-explanation. Coupled with immediate feedback and reflective exercises, learning can be measurably enhanced along with improved teaching skills.
同伴教学是促进知识学习和记忆的有效工具。通过准备教学,鼓励学生构建自己的学习计划,以便他们能够有效地向同伴学习者进行解释。本研究引入同伴教学,以培养一年级医学本科生理专业学生的学习和教学技能,并提出一个假设,即教学对教师而言与学习相关。
采用非随机干预性研究,混合方法设计。实验组经历同伴教学,而对照组连续四个课时接受辅导。通过对班级平均标准化增益的前后测分数分析、显著性检验、一个月后突击课堂测试的平均分数差异以及反馈问卷中封闭式问题的回答百分比进行定量评估。通过对开放式问题进行分类和对反思性陈述进行编码来进行定性评估。
实验组(p = 0.01)和对照组(p = 0.023)内的前后测平均分数具有统计学意义。实验组的后测平均分数更高,尽管无统计学意义。辅导课的班级平均标准化增益(g)为49%,同伴教学为53%。对照组突击测试的平均得分为36分(满分50分),实验组为41分。按部分分析,实验组中长答题(LAQ)的平均分数更高。部分分析表明,通过同伴教学,描述性答案的记忆效果更好,因为实验组中LAQ的平均分数更高。对同伴教学作为一种学习方法的效果,反馈回答主要为积极。反思性陈述被分类为行动中的反思、对行动的反思、主张证据、描述经验和认识差异。
教学可以刺激进一步学习,因为它涉及三个过程的相互作用:元认知意识;刻意练习和自我解释。加上即时反馈和反思练习,可以显著提高学习效果并改善教学技能。