Bansal Ruchika, Bansal Tajinder
Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College , Barwala, Panchkula, India .
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College , Barwala, Panchkula, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC11-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
To measure the amount of fluoride released and re released after recharging from various restorative materials: Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji II), Light Cure Resin Modified GIC (Fuji II LC), Giomer (Beautifil II), Compomer (Dyract).
Fifteen cylindrical specimens were prepared from each material. The specimens were immersed in 20 ml of deionized water. The amount of released fluoride was measured during the 1(st) day, 7(th) day and on the day15 by using specific fluoride electrode and an ion-analyser. After 15 days each material was divided into three Sub Groups of five samples each. Sub Group A served as control, Sub Group B was exposed to 2% NaF solution, Sub Group C to 1000ppm F toothpaste. The amount of fluoride re-released was measured during the 1(st) day, 7(th) day and on the day15 by using specific fluoride electrode and an ion-analyser. The results were statistically analysed using analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Tukey Kramer multiple comparison tests (p≤0.05).
Independent of the observation time period of the study the Conventional GIC released the highest amount of fluoride followed by RMGIC, Giomer and Compomer. The initial burst effect was seen with GIC'S but not with Giomer and Compomer. After topical fluoride application fluoride re release was highest in Sub Group B and GIC had a greater recharging ability followed by RMGIC, Giomer and Compomer. The fluoride re release was greatest on 1(st) day followed by rapid return to near exposure levels.
From the study it was concluded that, the initial Fluoride release was highest from Conventional GIC followed by Resin Modified GIC, Giomer and Compomer. The Fluoride re release was high when recharging with professional regime (2% NaF) as compared to home regime (Toothpaste). Conventional GIC had a greater recharging ability followed by Resin Modified GIC, Giomer and Compomer.
测定从各种修复材料再充电后释放和再释放的氟化物量:传统玻璃离子水门汀(富士II型)、光固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(富士II型LC)、聚酸改性复合树脂(碧兰美塑)、复合体(Dyract)。
每种材料制备15个圆柱形试件。将试件浸入20毫升去离子水中。在第1天、第7天和第15天使用特定的氟电极和离子分析仪测量释放的氟化物量。15天后,每种材料分为三个亚组,每组五个样本。A亚组作为对照,B亚组暴露于2%氟化钠溶液中,C亚组暴露于1000ppm含氟牙膏中。使用特定的氟电极和离子分析仪在第1天、第7天和第15天测量再释放的氟化物量。结果采用方差分析(单因素方差分析)和Tukey Kramer多重比较检验进行统计学分析(p≤0.05)。
无论研究的观察时间段如何,传统玻璃离子水门汀释放的氟化物量最高,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和复合体。玻璃离子水门汀出现初始突发效应,而聚酸改性复合树脂和复合体则未出现。局部应用氟化物后,B亚组的氟化物再释放最高,玻璃离子水门汀的再充电能力更强,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和复合体。氟化物再释放在第1天最大,随后迅速恢复到接近暴露水平。
从研究中得出结论,传统玻璃离子水门汀的初始氟化物释放最高,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和复合体。与家庭护理方式(牙膏)相比,专业护理方式(2%氟化钠)再充电时氟化物再释放较高。传统玻璃离子水门汀的再充电能力更强,其次是树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和复合体。