HISTORICAL RESPONSE RATES OF SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUES IN THE TREATMENT OF ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

OBJECTIVE

In a completed phase III study (C2305, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00600886), the reported rate of biochemical control with octreotide long-acting release (LAR) was lower than rates historically reported in patients pretreated and/or selected for response with somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy. To assess whether lower efficacy rates of octreotide LAR in C2305 were influenced by study design, a systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate response rates in previously published studies in acromegaly with similar design characteristics.

METHODS

PubMed was used to search for English-language clinical studies of acromegaly published through May 2014. Prospective studies of medically naïve patients (≥20) treated with SSAs for ≤12 months that reported efficacy rates using composite endpoint measures (growth hormone [GH] and insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]) were included. Two separate authors independently screened abstracts and full-length articles of each study to determine eligibility. All authors met to review and reach consensus when primary reviewers disagreed on the inclusion or exclusion of specific studies.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies (N = 354 patients) were identified, with reported mean efficacy rates of 31% (range, 20-54%). Of note, reported mean efficacy rates were lower in studies enrolling patients naïve to any form of treatment (surgery, medical, and/or radiation) than in studies that enrolled only medically naïve patients. A limitation of this analysis was that inclusion criteria restricted the number of studies analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Interpretation of biochemical response rates with SSAs is critically dependent on the context of the study and should be evaluated across clinical trials with similar study design characteristics.