• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对佩隆和基林(2015年)对博克斯、帕特森、肯迪格和哈里斯(2015年)评论的回复。

Reply to Pellón and Killeen's (2015) commentary on Boakes, Patterson, Kendig, and Harris (2015).

作者信息

Boakes Robert A

机构信息

University of Sydney.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):452-3. doi: 10.1037/xan0000075.

DOI:10.1037/xan0000075
PMID:26437385
Abstract

This reply notes the importance of data from variable-time schedules for resolving the issue of whether competition from magazine approach behavior is a major factor responsible for the concentration of schedule-induced drinking early in interpellet intervals. Pellón and Killeen propose that this temporal distribution of schedule-induced drinking reflects the effectiveness of adventitious reinforcement of this behavior over a delay, as detailed in their model. However, there is no evidence to support either of their key assumptions: (a) that schedule-induced behaviors are maintained by adventitious reinforcement ("are operants") and (b) that behaviors vary in their sensitivity to a delay before the subsequent occurrence of a reinforcer.

摘要

本回复指出了来自可变时间安排的数据对于解决以下问题的重要性

即来自杂志接近行为的竞争是否是导致颗粒间间隔早期日程诱导饮水集中的主要因素。佩隆和基林提出,日程诱导饮水的这种时间分布反映了这种行为在延迟期间偶然强化的有效性,正如他们模型中所详述的那样。然而,没有证据支持他们的两个关键假设:(a)日程诱导行为是由偶然强化维持的(“是操作性行为”),以及(b)行为对强化物随后出现之前的延迟的敏感性各不相同。

相似文献

1
Reply to Pellón and Killeen's (2015) commentary on Boakes, Patterson, Kendig, and Harris (2015).对佩隆和基林(2015年)对博克斯、帕特森、肯迪格和哈里斯(2015年)评论的回复。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):452-3. doi: 10.1037/xan0000075.
2
Responses compete and collaborate, shaping each others' distributions: Commentary on Boakes, Patterson, Kendig, and Harris (2015).反应相互竞争与协作,塑造彼此的分布:对博克斯、帕特森、肯迪格和哈里斯(2015年)的评论
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):444-51. doi: 10.1037/xan0000067.
3
Temporal distributions of schedule-induced licks, magazine entries, and lever presses on fixed- and variable-time schedules.固定时间和可变时间安排下,由时间表诱导的舔舐、进入食槽和按压杠杆行为的时间分布。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):52-68. doi: 10.1037/xan0000046. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
4
Interval, blocking, and marking effects during the development of schedule-induced drinking in rats.大鼠习惯性诱导饮水发展过程中的间隔、阻断和标记效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):303-14. doi: 10.1037/a0027788. Epub 2012 May 21.
5
Towards a mathematical model of within-session operant responding.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):292-302. doi: 10.1037/a0029086.
6
Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.在食物信号出现时的趋近行为取决于巴甫洛夫式条件作用,而非工具性条件作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Apr;39(2):107-16. doi: 10.1037/a0031315. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
7
Reinforcing and timing properties of water in the schedule-induced drinking situation.程序诱导饮水情境中水分的强化与定时特性
Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).延迟强化物对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)动物模型行为的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.034. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
9
A clozapine-like effect of cyproheptadine on progressive ratio schedule performance.赛庚啶对递增比率程序表现产生类氯氮平样作用。
J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun;26(6):857-70. doi: 10.1177/0269881111408961. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Food-delay duration and the development of schedule-induced polydipsia in rats.食物延迟时间与大鼠程序性诱导多饮的发展
Physiol Behav. 1995 Jun;57(6):1221-4. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00371-b.