McGugin Rankin W, Van Gulick Ana E, Gauthier Isabel
Vanderbilt University.
Carnegie Mellon University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;28(2):282-94. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00891. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
The fusiform face area (FFA) is defined by its selectivity for faces. Several studies have shown that the response of FFA to nonface objects can predict behavioral performance for these objects. However, one possible account is that experts pay more attention to objects in their domain of expertise, driving signals up. Here, we show an effect of expertise with nonface objects in FFA that cannot be explained by differential attention to objects of expertise. We explore the relationship between cortical thickness of FFA and face and object recognition using the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Vanderbilt Expertise Test, respectively. We measured cortical thickness in functionally defined regions in a group of men who evidenced functional expertise effects for cars in FFA. Performance with faces and objects together accounted for approximately 40% of the variance in cortical thickness of several FFA patches. Whereas participants with a thicker FFA cortex performed better with vehicles, those with a thinner FFA cortex performed better with faces and living objects. The results point to a domain-general role of FFA in object perception and reveal an interesting double dissociation that does not contrast faces and objects but rather living and nonliving objects.
梭状回面孔区(FFA)是由其对面孔的选择性所定义的。多项研究表明,FFA对非面孔物体的反应能够预测对这些物体的行为表现。然而,一种可能的解释是,专家会更加关注其专业领域内的物体,从而增强了信号。在此,我们展示了FFA中存在的对非面孔物体的专业知识效应,这种效应无法用对专业物体的不同关注度来解释。我们分别使用剑桥面孔记忆测试和范德比尔特专业知识测试,探究了FFA的皮质厚度与面孔及物体识别之间的关系。我们在一组男性中测量了功能定义区域的皮质厚度,这些男性在FFA中表现出对汽车的功能专业知识效应。面孔和物体的表现共同解释了几个FFA区域皮质厚度变异的约40%。FFA皮质较厚的参与者在车辆方面表现更好,而FFA皮质较薄的参与者在面孔和活体物体方面表现更好。研究结果表明FFA在物体感知中具有领域通用的作用,并揭示了一种有趣的双重分离现象,这种分离并非对比面孔和物体,而是对比活体和非活体物体。