Suppr超能文献

用于前牙和前磨牙单冠修复的钛锆窄径种植体与常规直径钛种植体:一项随机对照临床研究的3年结果

Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.

作者信息

Ioannidis Alexis, Gallucci German O, Jung Ronald E, Borzangy Sary, Hämmerle Christoph H F, Benic Goran I

机构信息

Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Nov;42(11):1060-70. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12468. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

Abstract

AIM

To test whether titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) 3.3 mm diameter implants perform differently from titanium (Ti) 4.1 mm diameter implants with respect to marginal bone level (MBL) and clinical parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty patients in need of a single-implant crown in the anterior or premolar regions were enrolled in two centres. Following random allocation, either a Ti-Zr or a Ti implant was inserted. Porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns were inserted 6 months after implantation. Implant survival, change in MBL, clinical parameters, change in mid-facial mucosa and papilla levels, and the occurrence of biological and technical complications were assessed at the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At 3 years, 32 of the 40 included patients were examined (15 Ti and 17 Ti-Zr implants). There were no implant failures. From the implant placement to 3 years, the median change in mean MBL amounted to 0.21 mm (mean: -0.31) in the Ti group and 0.10 mm (mean: -0.40) in the Ti-Zr group. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the change in MBL, the change in mucosa levels, and the occurrence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Ti-Zr implants with 3.3 mm diameter used for the support of single crowns in the anterior and the premolar regions did not differ from Ti implants with 4.1 mm diameter regarding the clinical performance over a 3-year period.

摘要

目的

测试直径3.3毫米的钛锆(Ti-Zr)种植体与直径4.1毫米的钛(Ti)种植体在边缘骨水平(MBL)和临床参数方面的表现是否不同。

材料与方法

两个中心招募了40名需要在前牙区或前磨牙区植入单颗种植体牙冠的患者。随机分配后,分别植入Ti-Zr种植体或Ti种植体。植入6个月后安装烤瓷熔附金属牙冠。在3年随访时评估种植体存活率、MBL变化、临床参数、面中黏膜和龈乳头水平变化以及生物和技术并发症的发生情况。

结果

3年时,对40名纳入患者中的32名进行了检查(15颗Ti种植体和17颗Ti-Zr种植体)。没有种植体失败。从种植体植入到3年,Ti组平均MBL的中位数变化为0.21毫米(平均值:-0.31),Ti-Zr组为0.10毫米(平均值:-0.40)。两组在MBL变化、黏膜水平变化和并发症发生方面没有显著差异。

结论

在3年期间,用于前牙区和前磨牙区单颗牙冠支持的直径3.3毫米的Ti-Zr种植体与直径4.1毫米的Ti种植体在临床性能上没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验