Benton J R, Watson A K, Erickson G E, Klopfenstein T J, Pol K J Vander, Meyer N F, Greenquist M A
J Anim Sci. 2015 Sep;93(9):4358-67. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9211.
Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of roughage source and inclusion in diets containing wet distillers' grains plus solubles (WDGS) on finishing cattle performance and ruminal metabolism. In Exp. 1, 385 crossbred steer calves (initial BW = 346 kg [SD 29]) were used in a finishing trial. A control diet with no roughage inclusion was compared with 6 diets containing either alfalfa hay (ALF), corn silage (CSIL), or corn stalks (CSTK) at 2 inclusions as a 3 × 2 factorial. Alfalfa hay was included at 4 (low) or 8% (standard) of diet DM. Diets containing CSIL or CSTK were formulated to provide total dietary NDF equal to the low and standard ALF inclusion diets. The final diets contained 6.13 and 12.26% CSIL or 3.04 and 6.08% CSTK (DM basis). All diets contained 30% WDGS and a 1:1 mixture of dry-rolled and high-moisture corn (DM basis). Cattle fed no roughage had reduced ( < 0.01) DMI and tended ( ≤ 0.10) to have the lowest final BW and ADG compared with cattle fed roughage. There were no differences ( ≥ 0.11) in DMI, ADG, or G:F due to roughage source. Cattle fed a standard inclusion of roughage had greater ( ≤ 0.04) DMI and ADG compared with cattle fed diets with low inclusion, regardless of roughage source. Feed efficiency tended to be different among treatments ( = 0.09), with cattle fed no roughage having greater G:F than all treatments ( ≤ 0.06) except cattle fed the low level of CSTK, which had a similar G:F ( = 0.48). Feed efficiency was not affected by source of roughage ( = 0.23) or inclusion of roughage ( = 0.49). In Exp. 2, 6 ruminally fistulated steers (347 kg BW [SD 25]) were used in a 6 × 6 Latin square design. Treatments were arranged as a 2 × 3 factorial with ALF or CSTK included at zero, low, or standard levels similar to Exp. 1. Apparent total tract digestibility (%) of DM, OM, and NDF decreased linearly ( ≤ 0.07) due to increasing roughage inclusion. Average, maximum, and minimum ruminal pH increased linearly ( ≤ 0.09) as roughage inclusion was increased. Based on the results of this study, low levels of CSTK improved cattle performance relative to low inclusions of ALF or CSIL. Diets with standard inclusions of ALF, CSIL, or CSTK had similar performance. Roughage sources can be exchanged to provide equal NDF in finishing diets containing 30% WDGS without negatively impacting finishing cattle. Based on ADG, eliminating roughages when 30% WDGS was included in finishing diets was not beneficial.
进行了两项试验,以确定粗饲料来源以及在含有湿酒糟及其可溶物(WDGS)的日粮中添加粗饲料对育肥牛生产性能和瘤胃代谢的影响。在试验1中,选用385头杂交阉牛犊牛(初始体重=346千克[标准差29])进行育肥试验。将不添加粗饲料的对照日粮与6种日粮进行比较,这6种日粮分别含有苜蓿干草(ALF)、玉米青贮(CSIL)或玉米秸秆(CSTK),按2个添加水平组成3×2析因试验。苜蓿干草按日粮干物质的4%(低水平)或8%(标准水平)添加。含有CSIL或CSTK的日粮配方设计为提供与低水平和标准水平苜蓿干草添加日粮相等的总日粮中性洗涤纤维(NDF)。最终日粮含有6.13%和12.26%的CSIL或3.04%和6.08%的CSTK(干物质基础)。所有日粮含有30%的WDGS以及干碾压玉米和高水分玉米1:1的混合物(干物质基础)。与饲喂粗饲料的牛相比,不饲喂粗饲料的牛干物质采食量(DMI)降低(P<0.01),且最终体重和平均日增重(ADG)有降低的趋势(P≤0.10)。由于粗饲料来源不同,DMI、ADG或料重比(G:F)没有差异(P≥0.11)。无论粗饲料来源如何,与饲喂低添加量粗饲料日粮的牛相比,饲喂标准添加量粗饲料的牛DMI和ADG更高(P≤0.04)。各处理间饲料效率有差异趋势(P=0.09),不饲喂粗饲料的牛G:F高于所有处理(P≤0.06),但饲喂低水平CSTK的牛除外,其G:F与之相似(P=0.48)。饲料效率不受粗饲料来源(P=0.23)或粗饲料添加量(P=0.49)的影响。在试验2中,选用6头瘤胃造瘘阉牛(体重347千克[标准差25])进行6×6拉丁方设计。处理按2×()析因试验安排,ALF或CSTK的添加量为零、低水平或标准水平,与试验1相似。随着粗饲料添加量增加,干物质、有机物和NDF的表观全消化道消化率(%)呈线性下降(P≤0.07)。随着粗饲料添加量增加,瘤胃平均pH值、最高pH值和最低pH值呈线性升高(P≤0.09)。基于本研究结果,低水平的CSTK相对于低水平的ALF或CSIL可提高牛的生产性能。含有标准添加量ALF、CSIL或CSTK的日粮生产性能相似。在含有30%WDGS的育肥日粮中,粗饲料来源可相互替换以提供相等的NDF,而不会对育肥牛产生负面影响。基于ADG,在育肥日粮中含有30%WDGS时去除粗饲料并无益处。