Smith Gary B, Prytherch David R, Meredith Paul, Schmidt Paul E
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education (CoPMRE), Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(8):872-5. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2015-0086.
The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of how patient deterioration is detected and how clinical care escalates when early warning score (EWS) systems are used.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors critically review a recent National Early Warning Score paper published in IJHCQA using personal experience and EWS-related publications, and debate the difference between detection and escalation.
Incorrect EWS choice or poorly understood EWS escalation may result in unnecessary workloads forward and responding staff.
EWS system implementers may need to revisit their guidance materials; medical and nurse educators may need to expand the curriculum to improve EWS system understanding and use.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper raises the EWS debate and alerts EWS users that scrutiny is required.
本文旨在增进对使用早期预警评分(EWS)系统时如何检测患者病情恶化以及临床护理如何升级的理解。
设计/方法/途径:作者运用个人经验和与EWS相关的出版物,对近期发表于《国际医疗保健质量与安全杂志》(IJHCQA)的一篇关于国家早期预警评分的论文进行批判性审视,并探讨检测与升级之间的差异。
错误选择EWS或对EWS升级理解不足可能导致一线工作人员和响应人员承担不必要的工作量。
EWS系统实施者可能需要重新审视其指导材料;医学和护理教育工作者可能需要扩展课程内容,以提高对EWS系统的理解和应用。
原创性/价值:本文引发了关于EWS的讨论,并提醒EWS使用者需要进行仔细审查。