• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化儿童语义语言成熟度

Quantifying Semantic Linguistic Maturity in Children.

作者信息

Hansson Kristina, Bååth Rasmus, Löhndorf Simone, Sahlén Birgitta, Sikström Sverker

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1183-99. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9398-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-015-9398-7
PMID:26440529
Abstract

We propose a method to quantify semantic linguistic maturity (SELMA) based on a high dimensional semantic representation of words created from the co-occurrence of words in a large text corpus. The method was applied to oral narratives from 108 children aged 4;0-12;10. By comparing the SELMA measure with maturity ratings made by human raters we found that SELMA predicted the rating of semantic maturity made by human raters over and above the prediction made using a child's age and number of words produced. We conclude that the semantic content of narratives changes in a predictable pattern with children's age and argue that SELMA is a measure quantifying semantic linguistic maturity. The study opens up the possibility of using quantitative measures for studying the development of semantic representation in children's narratives, and emphasizes the importance of word co-occurrences for understanding the development of meaning.

摘要

我们提出了一种基于大文本语料库中词共现所创建的词的高维语义表示来量化语义语言成熟度(SELMA)的方法。该方法应用于108名年龄在4岁0个月至12岁10个月的儿童的口头叙述。通过将SELMA测量结果与人类评分者给出的成熟度评级进行比较,我们发现,除了使用儿童年龄和所产生的单词数量进行预测之外,SELMA还能预测人类评分者给出的语义成熟度评级。我们得出结论,叙述的语义内容会随着儿童年龄的增长而以可预测的模式变化,并认为SELMA是一种量化语义语言成熟度的指标。该研究开启了使用定量测量方法来研究儿童叙述中语义表示发展的可能性,并强调了词共现对于理解意义发展的重要性。

相似文献

1
Quantifying Semantic Linguistic Maturity in Children.量化儿童语义语言成熟度
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1183-99. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9398-7.
2
Latent Semantic Analysis Discriminates Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) from Children with Typical Language Development.潜在语义分析区分发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童与典型语言发育儿童。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Jun;48(3):683-697. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-09625-8.
3
Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.语义多样性:一种基于词汇上下文使用变化的语义模糊性度量。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):718-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x.
4
Quality of pre-school children's pretend play and subsequent development of semantic organization and narrative re-telling skills.学前儿童假装游戏的质量与语义组织及叙事复述技能的后续发展
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Apr;17(2):148-58. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.941934. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
Clinician-child interactions: adjustments in linguistic complexity.临床医生与儿童的互动:语言复杂性的调整
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 May;16(2):119-27. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/016).
6
The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.数词的逻辑句法:理论、习得与加工
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):24-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
7
Linguistic and pragmatic aspects of narration in Finnish typically developing children and children with specific language impairment.芬兰语中典型发育儿童和特定语言障碍儿童叙述的语言及语用方面
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jun;28(6):413-27. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.875592. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Maternal input to children with specific language impairment during shared book reading: is mothers' language in tune with their children's production?母亲在与特定语言障碍儿童共同阅读时的输入:母亲的语言是否与孩子的产出相协调?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):204-14. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12062. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
9
Semantics of the transitive construction: prototype effects and developmental comparisons.及物结构的语义:原型效应与发展比较。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(7):1268-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01249.x. Epub 2012 May 16.
10
The role of linguistic context in deriving word meanings in individuals with Down Syndrome.在唐氏综合征患者中,语言语境在推导词义中的作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Semantic Analysis Discriminates Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) from Children with Typical Language Development.潜在语义分析区分发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童与典型语言发育儿童。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Jun;48(3):683-697. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-09625-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational methods to extract meaning from text and advance theories of human cognition.从文本中提取意义并推进人类认知理论的计算方法。
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;3(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01117.x. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
2
Iranian and Swedish adolescents: differences in personality traits and well-being.伊朗和瑞典青少年:人格特质和幸福感的差异。
PeerJ. 2013 Nov 5;1:e197. doi: 10.7717/peerj.197. eCollection 2013.
3
The semantic representation of event information depends on the cue modality: an instance of meaning-based retrieval.
事件信息的语义表示取决于提示模态:基于意义的检索实例。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 28;8(10):e73378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073378. eCollection 2013.
4
A collective theory of happiness: words related to the word "happiness" in Swedish online newspapers.幸福的综合理论:瑞典在线报纸中与“幸福”一词相关的词汇。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Jun;16(6):469-72. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0535. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
5
Atypical associations to abstract words in Broca's aphasia.布罗卡失语症中对抽象词汇的非典型联想。
Cortex. 2012 Sep;48(8):1068-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.009. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Changes in self and object representations following psychotherapy measured by a theory-free, computational, semantic space method.通过一种无理论、计算的语义空间方法测量心理治疗后自我和客体表象的变化。
Psychother Res. 2011 Jul;21(4):430-46. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.577824. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
7
Neighborhood density and word frequency predict vocabulary size in toddlers.邻里密度和单词频率可预测幼儿的词汇量。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jun;53(3):670-83. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0254).
8
Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx.使用 HiDEx 探索词汇共现空间。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):393-413. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.393.
9
Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: preferential attachment or preferential acquisition?早期语义网络的纵向分析:优先连接还是优先习得?
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):729-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02365.x. Epub 2009 May 15.
10
The psycholinguistics of developing text construction.发展性文本构建的心理语言学
J Child Lang. 2008 Nov;35(4):735-71. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908008787.