• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于测量牙线去除牙菌斑效果的口腔卫生指数的比较。

A comparison of two oral hygiene indexes for measuring the effectiveness of dental floss in plaque removal.

作者信息

Anaise J Z

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 1977 Winter;37(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1977.tb02877.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-7325.1977.tb02877.x
PMID:264564
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the OHI-S and the two versions of PHP Index in measuring the effectiveness of dental floss in the removal of dental plaque. The study demonstrated that the PHP Index provides a higher sensitivity than the OHI-S in measuring the effectiveness of approximal cleansing aids, such as dental floss. This, it seems that using the PHP Index in dental floss studies is preferable to using the OHI-S.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较口腔卫生指数简化版（OHI-S）和两种版本的菌斑指数（PHP指数）在测量牙线清除牙菌斑效果方面的差异。该研究表明，在测量诸如牙线等邻面清洁辅助工具的效果时，PHP指数比OHI-S具有更高的敏感性。因此，在牙线研究中使用PHP指数似乎比使用OHI-S更可取。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two oral hygiene indexes for measuring the effectiveness of dental floss in plaque removal.两种用于测量牙线去除牙菌斑效果的口腔卫生指数的比较。
J Public Health Dent. 1977 Winter;37(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1977.tb02877.x.
2
A comparison of the OHI-S and the PHP in an oral hygiene program.口腔卫生项目中OHI-S与PHP的比较。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1986 Jan-Feb;53(1):53-6.
3
Plaque-removing effect of dental floss and toothpicks in children 12-13 years of age.牙线和牙签对12至13岁儿童的去菌斑效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1976 Jul;4(4):137-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1976.tb00970.x.
4
Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss.不同牙间隙口腔卫生方法的比较：牙间隙刷与牙线对比
J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):759-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.759.
5
A comparison of the effectiveness of variable diameter vs. unwaxed floss.
J Periodontol. 1980 Nov;51(11):666-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1980.51.11.666.
6
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较：对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
7
[Efficiency of a new instrument: the Jet-Floss for the elimination of dental plaque].[一种新器械的效能：用于清除牙菌斑的喷气式牙线]
J Parodontol. 1990 Nov;9(4):337-43.
8
The effect of waxed and unwaxed dental floss on gingival health. Part I. Plaque removal and gingival response.涂蜡与未涂蜡牙线对牙龈健康的影响。第一部分。牙菌斑清除与牙龈反应。
J Periodontol. 1982 Jun;53(6):393-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.6.393.
9
[Comparative analysis of conventional dental floss and alternative materials].[传统牙线与替代材料的比较分析]
Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo. 1990 Jan-Mar;4(1):59-61.
10
Recommendations by dental staff and use of toothpicks, dental floss and interdental brushes for approximal cleaning in an adult Swedish population.瑞典成年人群中牙科工作人员的建议以及使用牙签、牙线和牙缝刷进行邻面清洁的情况。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;8(2):185-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Kiddie Doctors Education Strategy in Improving the Knowledge, Attitude, and Oral Hygiene Status of Elementary School Children.儿童医生教育策略对提高小学生的知识、态度和口腔卫生状况的作用
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Sep 28;10(5):549-554. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_116_20. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
2
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental caries.除刷牙外，家庭使用牙间隙清洁器具预防和控制牙周疾病及龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 10;4(4):CD012018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012018.pub2.
3
Behavioral research in preventive dentistry: educational and contingency management approaches to the problem of patient compliance.
预防牙科中的行为研究：针对患者依从性问题的教育与应急管理方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Summer;14(2):111-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-111.