Epstein Lauren, See Isaac, Edwards Jonathan R, Magill Shelley S, Thompson Nicola D
1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):2-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.245. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
OBJECTIVES To determine the impact of mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBIs) on central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates during the first year of MBI-LCBI reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) DESIGN Descriptive analysis of 2013 NHSN data SETTING Selected inpatient locations in acute care hospitals METHODS A descriptive analysis of MBI-LCBI cases was performed. CLABSI rates per 1,000 central-line days were calculated with and without the inclusion of MBI-LCBIs in the subset of locations reporting ≥1 MBI-LCBI, and in all locations (regardless of MBI-LCBI reporting) to determine rate differences overall and by location type. RESULTS From 418 locations in 252 acute care hospitals reporting ≥1 MBI-LCBIs, 3,162 CLABSIs were reported; 1,415 (44.7%) met the MBI-LCBI definition. Among these locations, removing MBI-LCBI from the CLABSI rate determination produced the greatest CLABSI rate decreases in oncology (49%) and ward locations (45%). Among all locations reporting CLABSI data, including those reporting no MBI-LCBIs, removing MBI-LCBI reduced rates by 8%. Here, the greatest decrease was in oncology locations (38% decrease); decreases in other locations ranged from 1.2% to 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of the potential impact of removing MBI-LCBIs from CLABSI data is needed to accurately interpret CLABSI trends over time and to inform changes to state and federal reporting programs. Whereas the MBI-LCBI definition may have a large impact on CLABSI rates in locations where patients with certain clinical conditions are cared for, the impact of MBI-LCBIs on overall CLABSI rates across inpatient locations appears to be more modest. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):2-7.
确定向国家医疗安全网(NHSN)报告黏膜屏障损伤实验室确诊血流感染(MBI-LCBI)的第一年中,MBI-LCBI对中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)发生率的影响。设计:对2013年NHSN数据进行描述性分析。设置:急性护理医院中选定的住院地点。方法:对MBI-LCBI病例进行描述性分析。在报告≥1例MBI-LCBI的地点子集中,以及在所有地点(无论是否报告MBI-LCBI),分别计算包含和不包含MBI-LCBI时每1000个中心静脉导管日的CLABSI发生率,以确定总体及按地点类型的发生率差异。结果:在252家急性护理医院的418个报告≥1例MBI-LCBI的地点中,共报告了3162例CLABSI;其中1415例(44.7%)符合MBI-LCBI定义。在这些地点中,从CLABSI发生率测定中去除MBI-LCBI后,肿瘤科室(49%)和病房地点(45%)的CLABSI发生率下降幅度最大。在所有报告CLABSI数据的地点中,包括那些未报告MBI-LCBI的地点,去除MBI-LCBI后发生率降低了8%。此处,下降幅度最大的是肿瘤科室(下降38%);其他地点的下降幅度在1.2%至4.2%之间。结论:为了准确解读CLABSI随时间的趋势并为州和联邦报告项目的变更提供依据,需要了解从CLABSI数据中去除MBI-LCBI的潜在影响。虽然MBI-LCBI定义可能对护理特定临床状况患者的地点的CLABSI发生率有很大影响,但MBI-LCBI对所有住院地点总体CLABSI发生率的影响似乎较为有限。《感染控制与医院流行病学》2015年;37(1):2 - 7。