Hampstead B M, Khoshnoodi M, Yan W, Deshpande G, Sathian K
Rehabilitation R&D Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VAMC, Decatur, GA 30033, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):997-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Previous research has shown that there is considerable overlap in the neural networks mediating successful memory encoding and retrieval. However, little is known about how the relevant human brain regions interact during these distinct phases of memory or how such interactions are affected by memory deficits that characterize mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a condition that often precedes dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Here we employed multivariate Granger causality analysis using autoregressive modeling of inferred neuronal time series obtained by deconvolving the hemodynamic response function from measured blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) time series data, in order to examine the effective connectivity between brain regions during successful encoding and/or retrieval of object location associations in MCI patients and comparable healthy older adults. During encoding, healthy older adults demonstrated a left hemisphere dominant pattern where the inferior frontal junction, anterior intraparietal sulcus (likely involving the parietal eye fields), and posterior cingulate cortex drove activation in most left hemisphere regions and virtually every right hemisphere region tested. These regions are part of a frontoparietal network that mediates top-down cognitive control and is implicated in successful memory formation. In contrast, in the MCI patients, the right frontal eye field drove activation in every left hemisphere region examined, suggesting reliance on more basic visual search processes. Retrieval in the healthy older adults was primarily driven by the right hippocampus with lesser contributions of the right anterior thalamic nuclei and right inferior frontal sulcus, consistent with theoretical models holding the hippocampus as critical for the successful retrieval of memories. The pattern differed in MCI patients, in whom the right inferior frontal junction and right anterior thalamus drove successful memory retrieval, reflecting the characteristic hippocampal dysfunction of these patients. These findings demonstrate that neural network interactions differ markedly between MCI patients and healthy older adults. Future efforts will investigate the impact of cognitive rehabilitation of memory on these connectivity patterns.
先前的研究表明,在介导成功的记忆编码和检索的神经网络中存在相当大的重叠。然而,对于相关的人类大脑区域在记忆的这些不同阶段如何相互作用,或者这些相互作用如何受到轻度认知障碍(MCI)所特有的记忆缺陷的影响,人们知之甚少。MCI是一种通常先于阿尔茨海默病所致痴呆的病症。在这里,我们使用多元格兰杰因果分析,通过对从测量的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)时间序列数据中反卷积血流动力学响应函数而获得的推断神经元时间序列进行自回归建模,以检查MCI患者和健康的老年对照者在成功编码和/或检索物体位置关联期间大脑区域之间的有效连接性。在编码过程中,健康的老年人表现出左半球主导模式,其中额下回交界处、顶内沟前部(可能涉及顶叶眼区)和后扣带回皮层驱动了大多数左半球区域以及几乎所有测试的右半球区域的激活。这些区域是介导自上而下认知控制的额顶网络的一部分,并且与成功的记忆形成有关。相比之下,在MCI患者中,右侧额叶眼区驱动了所检查的每个左半球区域的激活,这表明依赖于更基本的视觉搜索过程。健康老年人的检索主要由右侧海马体驱动,右侧丘脑前核和右侧额下回沟的贡献较小,这与认为海马体对成功检索记忆至关重要的理论模型一致。MCI患者的模式不同,其中右侧额下回交界处和右侧丘脑驱动了成功的记忆检索,反映了这些患者典型的海马体功能障碍。这些发现表明,MCI患者和健康老年人之间的神经网络相互作用存在显著差异。未来的研究将调查记忆的认知康复对这些连接模式的影响。