Baguelin Marc, Camacho Anton, Flasche Stefan, Edmunds W John
Respiratory Diseases Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 13;13:236. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0452-y.
The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of extending the pre-2013 influenza immunisation programme for high-risk and elderly individuals to those at low risk of developing complications following infection with seasonal influenza.
We performed an economic evaluation comparing different extensions of the pre-2013 influenza programme to seven possible age groups of low-risk individuals (aged 2-4 years, 50-64 years, 5-16 years, 2-4 and 50-64 years, 2-16 years, 2-16 and 50-64 years, and 2-64 years). These extensions are evaluated incrementally on four base scenarios (no vaccination, risk group only with coverage as observed between 1995 and 2009, risk group and 65+, and risk group with 75% coverage and 65+). Impact of vaccination is assessed using a transmission model built and parameterised from a previously published study. The study population is all individuals of all ages in England and Wales representing an average total of 52.6 million people over 14 influenza seasons (1995-2009).
The influenza programme (risk group and elderly) prior to 2013 is likely to be cost effective (incremental cost effectiveness ratio: 7,475 £/QALY, net benefit: 253 M£ [15-829]). Extension to any one of the low-risk target groups defined earlier is likely to be cost-effective. However, strategies that do not include vaccination of school-aged children are less likely to be cost-effective. The most efficient strategy is extension to the 5-16 year age group while universal vaccination (extension to all low-risk individuals over 2 years) will achieve the highest net benefit. While extension to the 2-16 year age group is likely to be very cost effective, the cost-effectiveness of extensions beyond 2-16 years is very uncertain. Extension to the 5-16 year age group would likely remain cost-effective even without herd immunity effects to other age groups. As our study includes a strong historical component, our results depend on the efficacy of the influenza vaccine remaining at levels similar to the ones achieved in the past over a long-period of time (assumed to vary between 28% and 70% depending of the circulating strains and age groups).
Making use of surveillance data from over a decade in conjunction with a dynamic model, we find that vaccination of children in the United Kingdom is likely to be highly cost-effective, not only for their own benefit but also to reduce the disease burden in the rest of the community.
本研究旨在评估将2013年前针对高危和老年个体的流感免疫计划扩展至感染季节性流感后发生并发症风险较低的个体的成本效益。
我们进行了一项经济评估,将2013年前流感计划的不同扩展方案与七个可能的低风险个体年龄组(2 - 4岁、50 - 64岁、5 - 16岁、2 - 4岁和50 - 64岁、2 - 16岁、2 - 16岁和50 - 64岁、2 - 64岁)进行比较。这些扩展方案在四个基础情景下进行增量评估(不接种疫苗、仅针对风险组且覆盖率为1995年至2009年期间观察到的情况、风险组和65岁以上人群、风险组且覆盖率为75%以及65岁以上人群)。使用基于先前发表的研究构建并参数化的传播模型评估疫苗接种的影响。研究人群为英格兰和威尔士所有年龄段的个体,在14个流感季节(1995 - 2009年)中平均总计5260万人。
2013年前的流感计划(风险组和老年人)可能具有成本效益(增量成本效益比:7475英镑/质量调整生命年,净效益:2.53亿英镑[15 - 829])。扩展至之前定义的任何一个低风险目标组可能具有成本效益。然而,不包括学龄儿童接种疫苗的策略不太可能具有成本效益。最有效的策略是扩展至5 - 16岁年龄组,而普遍接种疫苗(扩展至所有2岁以上的低风险个体)将实现最高净效益。虽然扩展至2 - 16岁年龄组可能非常具有成本效益,但超过2 - 16岁的扩展方案的成本效益非常不确定。即使对其他年龄组没有群体免疫效应,扩展至5 - 16岁年龄组可能仍具有成本效益。由于我们的研究包含很强的历史成分,我们的结果取决于流感疫苗的效力在很长一段时间内保持在与过去所达到的水平相似(假设根据流行毒株和年龄组在28%至70%之间变化)。
利用十多年的监测数据并结合动态模型,我们发现英国儿童接种疫苗不仅对他们自身有益,而且对于减轻社区其他人群的疾病负担而言可能具有很高的成本效益。