• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童生活质量系统量表(QLSI-C)平板版本与标准纸质版本的比较。

A comparison of a tablet version of the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory for Children (QLSI-C) to the standard paper version.

作者信息

Touchèque Malorie, Etienne Anne-Marie, Missotten Pierre, Dupuis Gilles

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Clinic of Human System, Health Psychology Unit, University of Liege.

Department of Psychology and Clinic of Human System, Psychology of Aging Unit, University of Liege.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):780-5. doi: 10.1037/pas0000234. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000234
PMID:26460896
Abstract

Integration of e-Health technologies for purposes of both assessment and intervention has recently become an interest area in pediatric psychology. The purpose of this study is to present psychometric characteristics of a technology-based (i.e., tablet administration) approach for measuring quality of life (QOL) in children. Eighty children (8-12 years) completed the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory for Children (QLSI-C) twice over a 2-week delay, in a crossover design that used paper and tablet-based modes of administration. Equivalence of scores across methods was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), augmented by paired t test and Pearson's correlations. Test-retest reliability was assessed using paired t test and Pearson's correlations while internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient. Results showed a good concordance across methods of administration (ICCs = .72 to .91; r = .56 to .83). Paired t test showed no significant differences between the tablet and paper version of the QLSI-C. Internal consistency reliability yielded acceptable Cronbach's alphas for all QLSI-C scores, with all α > .70. Test-retest reliability for the tablet-administered QLSI-C was good (r = .66 to .90). Paired t test showed no significant difference between Time 1 and 2 for the QLSI-C scores, except for the state score. Findings established the reliability of the tablet-administered QLSI-C scores. This technology approach to assessment is more attractive for children, decreases time for administration, and enhances the ease of scoring. These advantages might encourage both clinicians and researchers to consider using e-Health developments in assessment in pediatric psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

为了评估和干预而整合电子健康技术,最近已成为儿科心理学的一个热门领域。本研究的目的是呈现一种基于技术(即平板电脑给药)的方法来测量儿童生活质量(QOL)的心理测量特征。80名8至12岁的儿童采用交叉设计,在两周的间隔内两次完成儿童生活质量系统量表(QLSI-C),该设计使用纸质和基于平板电脑的给药方式。使用组内相关系数(ICC)检验不同方法得分的等效性,并辅以配对t检验和皮尔逊相关性分析。使用配对t检验和皮尔逊相关性分析评估重测信度,使用克朗巴赫系数评估内部一致性。结果显示不同给药方法之间具有良好的一致性(ICC = 0.72至0.91;r = 0.56至0.83)。配对t检验显示QLSI-C的平板电脑版和纸质版之间没有显著差异。所有QLSI-C得分的内部一致性信度产生了可接受的克朗巴赫α系数,所有α均大于0.70。平板电脑给药的QLSI-C的重测信度良好(r = 0.66至0.90)。配对t检验显示,除状态得分外,QLSI-C得分在第1次和第2次之间没有显著差异。研究结果确定了平板电脑给药的QLSI-C得分的可靠性。这种基于技术的评估方法对儿童更具吸引力,减少了给药时间,并提高了评分的便利性。这些优势可能会鼓励临床医生和研究人员在儿科心理学评估中考虑使用电子健康技术的发展。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
A comparison of a tablet version of the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory for Children (QLSI-C) to the standard paper version.儿童生活质量系统量表(QLSI-C)平板版本与标准纸质版本的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):780-5. doi: 10.1037/pas0000234. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
2
Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol.肠易激综合征生活质量测量量表、肠易激综合征工作效率与活动受限问卷以及欧洲五维度健康量表电子数据采集的验证
Value Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;9(2):98-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00087.x.
3
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile.《利物浦不良事件概况》保加利亚语版本的翻译、跨文化调适与验证
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Oct;39:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.08.124. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
4
The Mandarin Chinese version of the Beach Centre Family Quality of Life Scale: development and psychometric properties in Taiwanese families of children with developmental delay.海滩中心家庭生活质量量表中文版:台湾发育迟缓儿童家庭中的开发与心理测量特性
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Apr;61(4):373-384. doi: 10.1111/jir.12356. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of KIDSCREEN-27 and KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaires.KIDSCREEN - 27和KIDSCREEN - 10问卷日文版的信度与效度
Environ Health Prev Med. 2016 May;21(3):154-63. doi: 10.1007/s12199-016-0510-x. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Development and psychometric validation of a scoring questionnaire to assess healthy lifestyles among adolescents in Catalonia.用于评估加泰罗尼亚青少年健康生活方式的评分问卷的编制与心理测量学验证。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 28;16:89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2778-6.
8
Assessing health-related quality of life in young Japanese children with chronic conditions: Preliminary validation of the DISABKIDS smiley measure.评估患有慢性病的日本幼儿的健康相关生活质量:残疾儿童笑脸量表的初步验证
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0854-4.
9
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire for children/adolescents and parents/proxies.儿童青少年及家长/代理人用 KIDSCREEN-52 健康相关生活质量问卷日本版的信度和效度。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2015 Jan;20(1):44-52. doi: 10.1007/s12199-014-0427-1. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the self-report health-related quality of life measure for children and adolescents with epilepsy.中文版癫痫儿童及青少年自我报告健康相关生活质量量表的内部一致性和重测信度
Epilepsy Behav. 2006 Aug;9(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.系统评价:通用多维儿童患者报告结局测量的概念、年龄、测量和评估考虑因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):379-431. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0. Epub 2022 Jan 24.