Soler German A, Edgar Graham J, Thomson Russell J, Kininmonth Stuart, Campbell Stuart J, Dawson Terence P, Barrett Neville S, Bernard Anthony T F, Galván David E, Willis Trevor J, Alexander Timothy J, Stuart-Smith Rick D
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140270. eCollection 2015.
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) offer a unique opportunity to test the assumption that fishing pressure affects some trophic groups more than others. Removal of larger predators through fishing is often suggested to have positive flow-on effects for some lower trophic groups, in which case protection from fishing should result in suppression of lower trophic groups as predator populations recover. We tested this by assessing differences in the trophic structure of reef fish communities associated with 79 MPAs and open-access sites worldwide, using a standardised quantitative dataset on reef fish community structure. The biomass of all major trophic groups (higher carnivores, benthic carnivores, planktivores and herbivores) was significantly greater (by 40% - 200%) in effective no-take MPAs relative to fished open-access areas. This effect was most pronounced for individuals in large size classes, but with no size class of any trophic group showing signs of depressed biomass in MPAs, as predicted from higher predator abundance. Thus, greater biomass in effective MPAs implies that exploitation on shallow rocky and coral reefs negatively affects biomass of all fish trophic groups and size classes. These direct effects of fishing on trophic structure appear stronger than any top down effects on lower trophic levels that would be imposed by intact predator populations. We propose that exploitation affects fish assemblages at all trophic levels, and that local ecosystem function is generally modified by fishing.
海洋保护区(MPAs)提供了一个独特的机会来检验这样一种假设,即捕鱼压力对某些营养级群体的影响大于其他群体。人们常常认为,通过捕鱼去除大型捕食者会对一些较低营养级群体产生积极的连锁反应,在这种情况下,随着捕食者数量的恢复,免受捕鱼影响应会导致较低营养级群体数量减少。我们通过评估全球79个海洋保护区和开放捕捞区域相关的珊瑚礁鱼类群落营养结构差异来检验这一假设,使用了关于珊瑚礁鱼类群落结构的标准化定量数据集。相对于开放捕捞区域,在有效的禁捕海洋保护区中,所有主要营养级群体(高级食肉动物、底栖食肉动物、浮游生物食性动物和食草动物)的生物量显著更高(高出40% - 200%)。这种影响在大型个体中最为明显,但正如从较高的捕食者丰度所预测的那样,没有任何营养级群体的任何大小类别在海洋保护区中显示出生物量下降的迹象。因此,有效海洋保护区中更高的生物量意味着对浅海岩石和珊瑚礁的开发利用会对所有鱼类营养级群体和大小类别的生物量产生负面影响。捕鱼对营养结构的这些直接影响似乎比完整捕食者种群对较低营养级可能产生的任何自上而下的影响更强。我们认为,开发利用会影响所有营养级的鱼类组合,并且捕鱼通常会改变当地的生态系统功能。