Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术后神经认知结果的比较。

Comparison of Neurocognitive Outcomes after Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting.

作者信息

Kim Jerry J, Schwartz Samuel, Wen Johnny, deVirgilio Christian, Lobue Abeline, Walot Irwin, Koopmann Matthew, Donayre Carlos, White Rodney A

机构信息

Department of Surgery at Harbor-University of California Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2015 Oct;81(10):1010-4.

Abstract

Cognitive and emotional outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting with embolic protection device (CAS + EPD) are not clear. Patients were entered prospectively into a United States Food and Drug Administration-approved single-center physician-sponsored investigational device exemption between 2004 and 2010 and received either CEA or CAS + EPD. Patients underwent cognitive testing preprocedure and at 6, 12, and 60 months postprocedure. Cognitive domains assessed included attention, memory, executive, motor function, visual spatial functioning, language, and processing speed. Beck Depression and anxiety scales were also compared. There were a total of 38 patients that met conventional indications for carotid surgery (symptomatic with ≥50% stenosis or asymptomatic with ≥70% stenosis)-12 patients underwent CEA, whereas 26 patients underwent CAS + EPD. Both CEA and CAS + EPD patients showed postprocedure improvement in memory and executive function. No differences were seen at follow-up in regards to emotional dysfunction (depression and anxiety), attention, visual spatial functioning, language, motor function, and processing speed. Only two patients underwent neuropsychiatric testing at 60 months-these CAS + EPD patients showed sustained improvement in memory, visual spatial, and executive functions. In conclusion, cognitive and emotional outcomes were similar between CEA and CAS + EPD patients.

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和使用栓子保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术(CAS + EPD)后的认知和情绪结果尚不清楚。2004年至2010年间,患者被前瞻性纳入一项经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的单中心医生发起的研究性器械豁免试验,并接受CEA或CAS + EPD治疗。患者在术前以及术后6个月、12个月和60个月接受认知测试。评估的认知领域包括注意力、记忆力、执行功能、运动功能、视觉空间功能、语言和处理速度。还比较了贝克抑郁量表和焦虑量表。共有38例符合颈动脉手术传统指征的患者(有症状且狭窄≥50%或无症状且狭窄≥70%)——12例患者接受了CEA,而26例患者接受了CAS + EPD。CEA和CAS + EPD患者术后记忆力和执行功能均有改善。随访时在情绪功能障碍(抑郁和焦虑)、注意力、视觉空间功能、语言、运动功能和处理速度方面未发现差异。只有两名患者在60个月时接受了神经精神测试——这些CAS + EPD患者在记忆力、视觉空间和执行功能方面持续改善。总之,CEA和CAS + EPD患者的认知和情绪结果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验