Sabat Joseph, Bock Diane, Hsu Chiu-Hsieh, Tan Tze-Woei, Weinkauf Craig, Trouard Theodore, Perez-Carrillo Gloria Guzman, Zhou Wei
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1572-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Microembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization.
Patients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression.
A total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA.
Patients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.
颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的微栓塞现象已有文献记载,且可能会带来神经认知功能障碍风险。已知接受支架置入术的患者发生微栓塞的风险更高。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们比较了接受CAS和CEA的患者的微栓塞发生率以及可能与微栓塞相关的围手术期特征。
在一家学术医疗中心,经当地机构审查委员会批准,前瞻性招募接受CAS和CEA的患者。所有患者在术前及术后24小时内均接受3T脑磁共振成像及扩散加权成像序列检查,以识别与手术相关的新栓塞病灶。收集术前、术后、手术因素及斑块特征。采用逻辑回归分析各因素的统计学意义。
共有202例患者纳入研究。其中107例行CAS,95例行CEA。接受CAS的患者比接受CEA的患者更容易出现微栓子(78%对27%;P <.0001)。对于接受CAS的患者,颈外动脉通畅情况(比值比[OR],11.4;95%置信区间[CI],1.11 - 117.6;P =.04)、病变钙化(OR,5.68;95% CI,1.12 - 28.79;P =.04)及病变长度(OR,0.29;95% CI,0.08 - 1.01;P =.05)均被发现是围手术期栓塞的独立危险因素。这些因素并未增加接受CEA患者的风险。
接受CAS的患者围手术期栓塞风险更高。围手术期栓塞风险与病变长度及钙化有关。识别术前危险因素可能有助于指导患者选择,从而减少与栓塞相关的神经认知功能障碍。