• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Incorrect use and presentation of the RADNER Reading Charts: comment on measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs, by Altpeter E, Marx T, Nguyen N, Naumann A, Trauzettel-Klosinski S.

作者信息

Radner Wolfgang, Maaijwee Kristel, de Smet Marc D, Benesch Thomas

机构信息

Austrian Academy of Ophthalmology, Mollgasse 11, 1180, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Ophthalmology, HagaZiekenhuis, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;254(4):813-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3183-z. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-015-3183-z
PMID:26464177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4799789/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c281/4799789/ce91c1553ef9/417_2015_3183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c281/4799789/ce91c1553ef9/417_2015_3183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c281/4799789/ce91c1553ef9/417_2015_3183_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorrect use and presentation of the RADNER Reading Charts: comment on measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs, by Altpeter E, Marx T, Nguyen N, Naumann A, Trauzettel-Klosinski S.拉德纳阅读图表的错误使用与呈现：评用标准化文本测量阅读速度：单句与段落的比较，作者阿尔特彼得·E、马克思·T、阮·N、瑙曼·A、特劳泽特尔 - 克洛辛斯基·S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;254(4):813-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3183-z. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22.方法性偏倚、RADNER 阅读图表的错误使用以及避免在视力测量中进行误导性报告，见于 Kortuem C、Marx T、Altpeter E、Trauzettel-Klosinski S、Kuester-Gruber S 所著的《比较黄斑病变患者阅读标准化单句和段落的阅读速度》。《眼科研究》。2021 年；64(3):512 - 522。
Ophthalmic Res. 2022;65(2):239-243. doi: 10.1159/000520029. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
Reply to the letter to the editor: "Incorrect use and presentation of Radner reading charts: comment on measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs".致编辑的信的回复：“拉德纳阅读图表的错误使用与呈现：关于使用标准化文本测量阅读速度的评论：单句与段落的比较”
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;254(4):817-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3184-y. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
4
Comparison of reading performance tests concerning difficulty of sentences and paragraphs and their reliability.关于句子和段落难度的阅读性能测试及其可靠性的比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 May;35(3):324-35. doi: 10.1111/opo.12204.
5
Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.使用标准化文本测量阅读速度：单句与段落的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;253(8):1369-75. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3065-4. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy.比较黄斑病变患者阅读标准化单句和段落的阅读速度。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-522. doi: 10.1159/000509687. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Developing a Logarithmic Chinese Reading Acuity Chart.开发对数中文阅读视力表。
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Jun;94(6):714-724. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001081.
8
[The Dutch version of the Radner Reading Chart for assessing vision function].[用于评估视觉功能的拉德纳阅读图表荷兰语版本]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Nov 10;151(45):2494-7.
9
The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed.用于测量阅读速度的简短德语句子的有效性和可靠性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5. Epub 2002 Mar 16.
10
Design of short Italian sentences to assess near vision performance.用于评估近视力表现的简短意大利语句子设计。
J Optom. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of reading performance tests concerning difficulty of sentences and paragraphs and their reliability.关于句子和段落难度的阅读性能测试及其可靠性的比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 May;35(3):324-35. doi: 10.1111/opo.12204.
2
Subjective perception versus objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD.眼内注射雷珠单抗治疗渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性的主观感知与客观结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;250(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1792-8. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts.
荷兰版拉德纳阅读图表的可靠性测试。
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 May;85(5):353-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bf58b.
4
Discriminative power of reading tests to differentiate visual impairment caused by cataract and age-related macular degeneration.阅读测试在鉴别白内障和年龄相关性黄斑变性所致视力损害方面的辨别能力。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11):2111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.080.
5
Monocular and binocular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia.微小斜视性弱视儿童的单眼和双眼阅读表现
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1324-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.066688.
6
Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV.玻璃膜疣黄斑病变和视网膜下纤维化患者在脉络膜新生血管形成后的阅读表现差异。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;244(2):154-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-005-0063-y. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
7
Impairment of visual acuity and reading performance and the relationship with cataract type and density.视力和阅读能力受损及其与白内障类型和密度的关系。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):2071-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0890.
8
Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.标准化阅读图表系统的可靠性：方差成分分析、重测信度和图表间信度
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;242(1):31-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0776-8. Epub 2003 Dec 10.
9
The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed.用于测量阅读速度的简短德语句子的有效性和可靠性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5. Epub 2002 Mar 16.