van Vliet Liesbeth M, Harding Richard, Bausewein Claudia, Payne Sheila, Higginson Irene J
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 13;13:263. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0449-6.
Clinicians request guidance to aid the routine use and interpretation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), but tools are lacking. We aimed to develop a Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) focused on information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness (measured using the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS)) and related PROM implementation guidance.
We drafted recommendations based on findings from systematic literature searches. In a modified online Delphi study, 38 experts from 12 countries with different professional backgrounds, including four patient/carer representatives, were invited to rate the appropriateness of these recommendations for problems of varying severity in the CDST. The quality of evidence was added for each recommendation, and the final draft CDST reappraised by the experts. The accompanying implementation guidance was built on data from literature scoping with expert revision (n = 11 invited experts).
The systematic literature searches identified over 560 potential references, of which 43 met the inclusion criteria. Two Delphi rounds (response rate 66% and 62%; n = 25 and 23) found that good patient care, psychosocial support and empathy, and open communication were central to supporting patients and families affected by all POS concerns as a core requirement. Assessment was recommended for increasing problems (i.e. scores), followed by non-pharmacological interventions and for breathlessness and depression, pharmacological interventions. Accompanying PROM implementation guidance was built based on the 8-step International Society for Quality of Life Research framework, as revised by nine (response rate 82%) experts.
This CDST provides a straightforward guide to help support clinical care and improve evidence-based outcomes for patients with progressive illness and their families, addressing four areas of clinical uncertainty. Recommendations should be used flexibly, alongside skilled individual clinical assessment and knowledge, taking into account patients' and families' individual preferences, circumstances, and resources. The CDST is provided with accompanying implementation guidance to facilitate PROM use and is ready for further development and evaluation.
临床医生需要指导以辅助患者报告结局量表(PROMs)的常规使用和解读,但目前缺乏相关工具。我们旨在开发一种临床决策支持工具(CDST),该工具聚焦于信息需求、家庭焦虑、抑郁以及呼吸困难(使用姑息治疗结局量表(POS)进行测量),并提供相关的PROM实施指南。
我们根据系统文献检索的结果起草了建议。在一项经过改进的在线德尔菲研究中,邀请了来自12个国家、具有不同专业背景的38位专家,包括4位患者/护理者代表,对这些建议针对CDST中不同严重程度问题的适用性进行评分。为每条建议添加了证据质量,专家们对最终的CDST草案进行了重新评估。随附的实施指南基于文献综述数据并经过专家修订(邀请了11位专家)。
系统文献检索确定了560多篇潜在参考文献,其中43篇符合纳入标准。两轮德尔菲调查(回复率分别为66%和62%;n = 25和23)发现,良好的患者护理、心理社会支持与同理心以及开放沟通是支持受所有POS问题影响的患者和家庭的核心要求。对于问题增加(即分数升高)的情况,建议进行评估,随后采取非药物干预措施;对于呼吸困难和抑郁,建议采取药物干预措施。随附的PROM实施指南基于九位(回复率82%)专家修订的8步国际生活质量研究协会框架制定。
该CDST提供了一个直接的指南,以帮助支持临床护理并改善进展性疾病患者及其家庭基于证据的结局,解决四个临床不确定性领域的问题。建议应灵活使用,结合熟练的个体临床评估和知识,同时考虑患者和家庭的个人偏好、情况及资源。CDST配有随附的实施指南以促进PROM的使用,并且准备好进行进一步开发和评估。