School of Law and Criminology, University of Greenwich, UK.
Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Med Sci Law. 2024 Apr;64(2):157-163. doi: 10.1177/00258024231206865. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
This article advocates for integrating procedural justice principles into forensic mental health services to enhance patient engagement and autonomy. Procedural justice, broadly defined as fair decision-making processes, is introduced and key principles including voice, neutrality, respect and trustworthiness are described. Evidence suggestive of positive outcomes following procedural justice experiences, such as improved satisfaction, collaboration and reduced perceptions of coercion is outlined. Practical applications are suggested, including staff training and reflective practices using procedural justice principles. The article then calls for further research to explore patients' and staff members' experiences of procedural justice in forensic settings, develop measurement tools, undertake intervention studies and establish causal links between procedural justice and outcomes important for forensic patients.
本文主张将程序公正原则融入法医心理健康服务中,以增强患者的参与度和自主性。程序公正被广义地定义为公平的决策过程,本文介绍了其关键原则,包括发言权、中立性、尊重和可信赖性。概述了程序公正经验可能带来的积极结果的证据,例如提高满意度、合作度以及减少对强制的看法。提出了实际应用的建议,包括使用程序公正原则对工作人员进行培训和反思实践。文章接着呼吁进一步研究,以探索法医环境中患者和工作人员对程序公正的体验,开发测量工具,进行干预研究,并确定程序公正与法医患者重要结果之间的因果关系。