Suppr超能文献

检测继发龋损:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Brouwer F, Askar H, Paris S, Schwendicke F

机构信息

Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

出版信息

J Dent Res. 2016 Feb;95(2):143-51. doi: 10.1177/0022034515611041. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

Abstract

Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present.

摘要

继发龋损是牙体修复的主要晚期并发症,限制了修复体的使用寿命,并因反复干预而产生费用。准确检测继发龋损对于评估疾病的真实负担和分配适当的治疗方法至关重要。我们旨在评估继发龋损检测方法的准确性。纳入临床或体外研究,这些研究调查了5种检测方法(视觉、触觉、X线摄影、激光荧光、定量光激发荧光)对自然或人工诱导的继发龋损的准确性,并与既定的参考测试进行了验证。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比以及诊断比值比,并评估了发表偏倚。在1179项筛选研究中,纳入了23项。大多数研究是在体外对恒牙后牙进行的,存在较高的偏倚风险或适用性问题。龋损位于邻面(14项研究)或其他表面,与汞合金(16项研究)或牙色材料相邻。视觉检测(n = 11)、X线摄影检测(n = 13)和激光荧光检测(n = 8)具有相似的敏感性(0.50至0.59)和特异性(0.78至0.83),视觉评估在非邻面表面更准确,激光荧光评估在与复合树脂相邻处更准确。触觉评估(n = 7)准确性较低。光激发荧光检测(n = 3)在非邻面表面敏感,但特异性较低。大多数分析似乎存在发表偏倚。尽管继发龋损是一个重大的临床和口腔公共卫生问题,但仅有少数研究对其进行了评估,且有效性和适用性有限。视觉、X线摄影和激光荧光检测可能有助于检测继发龋损。目前,触觉评估和定量光激发荧光的有效性仍不明确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验