Siddiqui Ammar, Belland Laura, Rivera-Reyes Laura, Handel Daniel, Yadav Kabir, Heard Kennon, Eisenberg Amanda, Hwang Ula
*Emergency Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY †Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC ‡Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA §Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO ∥Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY.
Med Care. 2015 Nov;53(11):948-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000430.
Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders.
A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes.
A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009.
A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n=1682) or AP (n=5249) were included.
The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity.
On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P<0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P<0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P=0.360; Order: P=0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR=0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P<0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P=0.357).
In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.
以往关于急诊科疼痛护理中性别差异的研究仅限于单一疼痛状况、单一研究地点,且缺乏对混杂因素的严格控制。
对性别对腹痛(AP)和骨折疼痛(FP)护理结果的影响进行多中心评估。
对2009年1月、4月、7月和10月美国5家医院急诊科就诊情况进行回顾性队列研究。
共纳入6931例最终急诊科诊断为FP(n = 1682)或AP(n = 5249)的患者。
主要预测因素为性别。主要结局为给予镇痛药的时间。次要结局包括开具药物医嘱的时间、分诊后360分钟内接受镇痛药治疗的可能性以及疼痛评分的变化:采用按研究地点聚类的多变量模型,对种族、年龄、合并症、初始疼痛评分、急诊科拥挤程度和分诊 acuity进行调整。
经调整分析,与男性相比,AP女性给予镇痛药的等待时间更长[AP女性:112(65 - 187)分钟,男性:96(52 - 167)分钟,P < 0.001],开具医嘱的时间也更长[女性:84(41 - 160)分钟,男性:71(32 - 137)分钟,P < 0.001],而FP女性则不然(给予镇痛药:P = 0.360;开具医嘱:P = 0.133)。与男性相比,AP女性在最初90分钟内接受镇痛药治疗的可能性较小(OR = )。
在这项多中心研究中,我们发现女性在AP的镇痛药给药方面存在延迟,但在FP方面不存在。未来减少疼痛护理中性别差异的研究和干预措施应考虑疼痛类型。