• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

启动和完成重症监护限时试验的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and Facilitators to Initiating and Completing Time-Limited Trials in Critical Care.

机构信息

1Department of Medicine, Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital System, Houston Methodist Hospital System Biomedical Ethics Program, Houston, TX. 3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. 5Division of Palliative Care, Department of Nursing, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. 6Division of Social Work, Department of Social Work and Case Management, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. 7Department of Critical Care Medicine, Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2535-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001307.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001307
PMID:26465223
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A time-limited trial is an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision makers to use medical therapies over a defined period of time to see if the patient improves or deteriorates according to agreed-upon clinical milestones. Although time-limited trials are broadly advocated, there is little empirical evidence of the benefits and risks of time-limited trials, when they are initiated, when and why they succeed or fail, and what facilitates completion of them. Our study objectives were to 1) identify the purposes for which clinicians use time-limited trials and 2) identify barriers and facilitators to initiating and completing time-limited trials.

DESIGN

Semistructured interviews: We analyzed interviews using qualitative description with constant comparative techniques.

SETTING

Nine hundred-bed, academic, tertiary hospital in Houston, Texas. Interviewees were from open medical, surgical, neurosurgical, and cardiovascular ICUs.

SUBJECTS

Thirty healthcare professionals were interviewed (nine surgeons, 16 intensivists, three nurse practitioners, and two "other" clinicians).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Interviewees reported initiating time-limited trials for three different purposes: to prepare surrogates and clinicians for discussion and possible shifts toward comfort-care only therapies, build consensus, and refine prognostic information. The main barriers to initiating time-limited trials involve clinicians' or surrogate decision makers' disagreement on setting a time limit. Barriers to completing time-limited trials include 1) requesting more time; 2) communication breakdowns because of rotating call schedules; and 3) changes in clinical course. Finally, facilitators to completing time-limited trials include 1) having defined goals about what could be achieved during an ICU stay, either framed in narrow, numeric terms or broad goals focusing on achievable activities of daily living; 2) applying time-limited trials in certain types of cases; and 3) taking ownership to ensure completion of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of barriers and facilitators to initiating and completing time-limited trials is an essential first step toward appropriate utilization of time-limited trials in the ICUs, as well as developing educational or communication interventions with clinicians to facilitate time-limited trial use. We provide practical suggestions on patient populations in whom time-limited trials may be successful, the setting, and clinicians likely to benefit from educational interventions, allowing clinicians to have a fuller sense of when and how to use time-limited trials.

摘要

目的

限时试验是临床医生和患者或替代决策人之间的一项协议,即在规定的时间内使用医疗疗法,以观察患者是否根据商定的临床里程碑改善或恶化。尽管广泛提倡限时试验,但关于何时启动限时试验、何时以及为何成功或失败以及什么有助于完成限时试验,其益处和风险的经验证据很少。我们的研究目的是:1)确定临床医生使用限时试验的目的;2)确定启动和完成限时试验的障碍和促进因素。

设计

半结构化访谈:我们使用定性描述和恒定性比较技术分析访谈。

地点

德克萨斯州休斯顿的一家拥有 900 张床位的学术性三级医院。受访者来自开放式医疗、外科、神经外科和心血管 ICU。

研究对象

共采访了 30 名医疗保健专业人员(9 名外科医生、16 名重症监护医生、3 名执业护士和 2 名“其他”临床医生)。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

受访者报告了启动限时试验的三个不同目的:为讨论和可能转向仅提供舒适护理的治疗方法、建立共识和完善预后信息做准备;为临床医生或替代决策人设定时间限制方面存在分歧是启动限时试验的主要障碍。完成限时试验的障碍包括:1)要求更多时间;2)由于轮班时间表导致沟通中断;3)临床过程的变化。最后,完成限时试验的促进因素包括:1)在 ICU 期间,对可以实现的目标有明确的定义,要么以狭窄的数字术语定义,要么以关注可实现的日常生活活动的广泛目标来定义;2)将限时试验应用于某些类型的病例;3)拥有所有权以确保试验完成。

结论

了解启动和完成限时试验的障碍和促进因素是在 ICU 中适当利用限时试验的必要的第一步,也是与临床医生一起开展教育或沟通干预以促进限时试验使用的第一步。我们就可能成功的患者人群、设置和可能从教育干预中受益的临床医生提供了实际建议,使临床医生更全面地了解何时以及如何使用限时试验。

相似文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Initiating and Completing Time-Limited Trials in Critical Care.启动和完成重症监护限时试验的障碍和促进因素。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2535-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001307.
2
Conflict Management Strategies in the ICU Differ Between Palliative Care Specialists and Intensivists.重症监护病房(ICU)中姑息治疗专家和重症监护医生的冲突管理策略存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):934-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001583.
3
Time-Limited Trials in the ICU: Seeing the Forest Beyond the Bark and Trees.重症监护病房中的限时试验:透过表象洞察本质。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2676-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001363.
4
Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study.重症监护医生报告的与重症监护病房替代决策者讨论出院后结局的促进因素和障碍。一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC.
5
How Clinician-Family Interactions Potentially Impact Clinicians' Conceptualization and Discussions Regarding Prognostic Uncertainties.临床医生与家属的互动如何可能影响临床医生对预后不确定性的概念化及讨论。
J Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-33. doi: 10.1177/0825859719845005. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
A multicenter study of key stakeholders' perspectives on communicating with surrogates about prognosis in intensive care units.一项关于关键利益相关者对在重症监护病房与代孕者沟通预后情况的观点的多中心研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Feb;12(2):142-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201407-325OC.
7
Use of a daily goals checklist for morning ICU rounds: a mixed-methods study.在重症监护病房晨间查房中使用每日目标清单:一项混合方法研究。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1797-803. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000331.
8
End-of-Life Decision-Making for ICU Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Team Insights.重症监护病房有限英语能力患者的临终决策:医疗团队观点的定性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1380-1387. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003920.
9
Documentation of best interest by intensivists: a retrospective study in an Ontario critical care unit.重症监护医生记录最佳利益:安大略省重症监护病房的回顾性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Feb 10;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-1.
10
A qualitative study exploring moral distress in the ICU team: the importance of unit functionality and intrateam dynamics.一项探索重症监护室团队道德困扰的定性研究:科室功能及团队内部动态的重要性
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000822.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the Documentation of Time-Limited Trials in Goals of Care Notes.在照护目标记录中描述限时试验的文档记录
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Aug;70(2):e129-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.007. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Communicating with Families after Severe Acute Brain Injury.重度急性脑损伤后与家属沟通
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02252-x.
3
Delayed Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Disorders of Consciousness: Practical and Theoretical Considerations.意识障碍患者生命维持治疗的延迟撤除:实践与理论考量
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct 15. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02143-7.
4
Characterizing the Use of Time-Limited Trials in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study.急性呼吸衰竭患者限时试验应用特征分析:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Sep 16;6(9):e1148. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001148. eCollection 2024 Sep 1.
5
An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.神经重症监护中的姑息治疗最新进展:面对预后不确定性时提供目标一致的护理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023 Dec;25(12):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
6
Time-Limited Trials for Patients With Critical Illness: A Review of the Literature.危重症患者限时临床试验:文献综述。
Chest. 2024 Apr;165(4):881-891. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.014. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
7
Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义危重症患者的限时临床试验:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):187-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST.
8
Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.早期共同决策在老年创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用:使用限时试验并了解其局限性。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01764-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
The research environment of critical care in three Asian countries: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.三个亚洲国家重症监护的研究环境:一项横断面问卷调查
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 20;9:975750. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.975750. eCollection 2022.
10
"No Escalation of Treatment" Designations: A Multi-institutional Exploratory Qualitative Study.“不升级治疗”指定:一项多机构探索性定性研究。
Chest. 2023 Jan;163(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2211. Epub 2022 Aug 23.