• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义危重症患者的限时临床试验:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。

Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):187-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST
PMID:38063572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10848901/
Abstract

In critical care, the specific, structured approach to patient care known as a "time-limited trial" has been promoted in the literature to help patients, surrogate decision makers, and clinicians navigate consequential decisions about life-sustaining therapy in the face of uncertainty. Despite promotion of the time-limited trial approach, a lack of consensus about its definition and essential elements prevents optimal clinical use and rigorous evaluation of its impact. The objectives of this American Thoracic Society Workshop Committee were to establish a consensus definition of a time-limited trial in critical care, identify the essential elements for conducting a time-limited trial, and prioritize directions for future work. We achieved these objectives through a structured search of the literature, a modified Delphi process with 100 interdisciplinary and interprofessional stakeholders, and iterative committee discussions. We conclude that a time-limited trial for patients with critical illness is a collaborative plan among clinicians and a patient and/or their surrogate decision makers to use life-sustaining therapy for a defined duration, after which the patient's response to therapy informs the decision to continue care directed toward recovery, transition to care focused exclusively on comfort, or extend the trial's duration. The plan's 16 essential elements follow four sequential phases: consider, plan, support, and reassess. We acknowledge considerable gaps in evidence about the impact of time-limited trials and highlight a concern that if inadequately implemented, time-limited trials may perpetuate unintended harm. Future work is needed to better implement this defined, specific approach to care in practice through a person-centered equity lens and to evaluate its impact on patients, surrogates, and clinicians.

摘要

在重症监护中,一种被称为“限时试验”的针对患者护理的特定、结构化方法已在文献中得到推广,以帮助患者、替代决策人以及临床医生在面对不确定的情况下,就维持生命的治疗做出重大决策。尽管限时试验方法得到了推广,但由于缺乏对其定义和基本要素的共识,妨碍了其在临床中的最佳应用和对其影响的严格评估。美国胸科学会工作组的目标是为重症监护中的限时试验建立一个共识定义,确定进行限时试验的基本要素,并为未来的工作确定优先方向。我们通过对文献进行系统搜索、对 100 名跨学科和跨专业利益相关者进行修改后的 Delphi 流程以及迭代委员会讨论来实现这些目标。我们的结论是,对于患有危重病的患者,限时试验是临床医生与患者和/或其替代决策人之间的一项协作计划,用于在规定的时间内使用维持生命的治疗,在此之后,患者对治疗的反应将决定继续进行以恢复为目标的护理、过渡到仅关注舒适的护理,或延长试验的持续时间。该计划的 16 个基本要素遵循四个连续阶段:考虑、计划、支持和重新评估。我们承认关于限时试验影响的证据存在很大差距,并强调关注如果实施不当,限时试验可能会造成不必要的伤害。需要进一步的工作来通过以患者为中心的公平视角更好地将这种定义明确、具体的护理方法付诸实践,并评估其对患者、替代决策人和临床医生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/f5e370e5cecb/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/7b50e9a3b8cc/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/0320ef4e9afd/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/f5e370e5cecb/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/7b50e9a3b8cc/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/0320ef4e9afd/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f9/10848901/f5e370e5cecb/AnnalsATS.202310-925STf3.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义危重症患者的限时临床试验:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):187-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST.
2
Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.重症监护病房中的共同决策:美国危重病医学会和美国胸科学会政策声明
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):188-201. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396.
3
Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unrepresented Patients in the ICU. An Official American Thoracic Society/American Geriatrics Society Policy Statement.为 ICU 中未被代表的患者做出医疗决策。美国胸科学会/美国老年医学学会官方政策声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1182-1192. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0512ST.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Time-Limited Trials for Patients With Critical Illness: A Review of the Literature.危重症患者限时临床试验:文献综述。
Chest. 2024 Apr;165(4):881-891. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.014. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
Legal preparedness: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.法律准备:大流行和灾难期间危重症患者及伤者的护理:CHEST共识声明
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e134S-44S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0741.
7
Barriers and Facilitators of Surrogates Providing Consent for Critically Ill Patients in Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study.代表重病患者参与临床试验时的同意书提供:定性研究中的障碍和促进因素。
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.027. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
The Voice of Surrogate Decision-Makers. Family Responses to Prognostic Information in Chronic Critical Illness.替代决策者的声音。家庭对慢性危重病预后信息的反应。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):864-872. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0201OC.
9
Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of a Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Surrogates of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury.严重急性脑损伤患者代理人的关怀目标决策辅助工具的初步随机临床试验。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 3;99(14):e1446-e1455. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200937.
10
Discussion of treatment trials in intensive care.讨论重症监护中的治疗试验。
J Crit Care. 2013 Oct;28(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropalliative Care in the Emergency Department: Three Roles, One Goal.急诊科的神经姑息治疗:三个角色,一个目标。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02361-7.
2
Understanding cancer disease status and what it means for intensivists.了解癌症疾病状况及其对重症监护医生的意义。
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01320-6.
3
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Intensive Care Unit Consultation.姑息治疗临床医生在重症监护病房会诊时应了解的十大技巧。

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Interprofessional Teamwork on Aligning Intensive Care Unit Care with Patient Goals: A Qualitative Study of Transactive Memory Systems.跨专业团队合作对使重症监护病房护理与患者目标保持一致的影响:对动态记忆系统的定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Apr;20(4):548-555. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-820OC.
2
Whose Good Death? Valuation and Standardization as Mechanisms of Inequality in Hospitals.谁的善终?医院不平等的评估与标准化机制
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Jun;65(2):221-236. doi: 10.1177/00221465221143088. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
3
Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement.
J Palliat Med. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1177/10966218251366072.
4
Palliative and End-of-Life Care During Critical Cardiovascular Illness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.危重心血管疾病期间的姑息治疗与临终关怀:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2025 Jun 17;151(24):e1075-e1090. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001334. Epub 2025 May 15.
5
Characterizing the Documentation of Time-Limited Trials in Goals of Care Notes.在照护目标记录中描述限时试验的文档记录
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Aug;70(2):e129-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.007. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
6
Bridging the gap: improving the long-term management of very old patients in intensive care.缩小差距:改善高龄重症患者的长期管理
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Apr 13. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01190-3.
7
Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.机械通气患者的替代者和医生在两个时间点的结果预测
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1235. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
8
ESICM consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old patients in intensive care.欧洲重症监护医学学会关于重症监护中高龄患者管理的基于共识的建议。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Feb;51(2):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07794-4. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
9
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.一项随机对照试验的研究方案:在急诊科整合“限时试验”
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.
10
Challenges with Formulating Accurate Prognosis for Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury.为重度急性脑损伤患者制定准确预后的挑战。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02170-4.
严重呼吸系统疾病患者的照护延续链中的舒缓医疗:美国胸科学会/美国临终关怀与姑息医学学会/美国护士麻醉师协会/世界卫生组织姑息治疗联盟政策声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):e44-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1262ST.
4
Interpersonal Perception: Family- and Physician-reported Conflict in the Intensive Care Unit.人际认知:重症监护病房中家庭与医生报告的冲突
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Nov;19(11):1937-1942. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202202-147RL.
5
Time-limited trials in the ICU: a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study of intensivists at two academic centres.ICU 限时试验:对两家学术中心的重症监护医师进行的混合方法序贯解释性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e059325. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059325.
6
Precision communication: Physicians' linguistic adaptation to patients' health literacy.精准沟通:医生对患者健康素养的语言调适
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 17;7(51):eabj2836. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj2836.
7
Communicating About Time-Limited Trials.关于限时试验的沟通。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.071. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Relevance to Crisis Standards of Care.按种族划分的序贯器官衰竭评估评分对住院死亡率的准确性和与危重病标准护理的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13891.
9
Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments.评估患有晚期内科疾病的危重症患者的限时试验和减少无益的 ICU 治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jun 1;181(6):786-794. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000.
10
"Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.“不要与他们谈论照护目标”:理解预先医疗照护计划中的差异。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):339-346. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab091.