Pereira Lílian Paternostro de Pina, Masson Maria Lúcia Vaz, Carvalho Fernando Martins
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, BR.
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, BR.
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:67. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005716. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of two speech therapy interventions, vocal warm-up and breathing training, focusing on teachers' voice quality.METHODS A single-blind, randomized, parallel clinical trial was conducted. The research included 31 20 to 60-year old teachers from a public school in Salvador, BA, Northeasatern Brazil, with minimum workloads of 20 hours a week, who have or have not reported having vocal alterations. The exclusion criteria were the following: being a smoker, excessive alcohol consumption, receiving additional speech therapy assistance while taking part in the study, being affected by upper respiratory tract infections, professional use of the voice in another activity, neurological disorders, and history of cardiopulmonary pathologies. The subjects were distributed through simple randomization in groups vocal warm-up (n = 14) and breathing training (n = 17). The teachers' voice quality was subjectively evaluated through the Voice Handicap Index (Índice de Desvantagem Vocal, in the Brazilian version) and computerized voice analysis (average fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, noise, and glottal-to-noise excitation ratio) by speech therapists.RESULTS Before the interventions, the groups were similar regarding sociodemographic characteristics, teaching activities, and vocal quality. The variations before and after the intervention in self-assessment and acoustic voice indicators have not significantly differed between the groups. In the comparison between groups before and after the six-week interventions, significant reductions in the Voice Handicap Index of subjects in both groups were observed, as wells as reduced average fundamental frequencies in the vocal warm-up group and increased shimmer in the breathing training group. Subjects from the vocal warm-up group reported speaking more easily and having their voices more improved in a general way as compared to the breathing training group.CONCLUSIONS Both interventions were similar regarding their effects on the teachers' voice quality. However, each contribution has individually contributed to improve the teachers' voice quality, especially the vocal warm-up.TRIAL RECORD NCT02102399, "Vocal Warm-up and Respiratory Muscle Training in Teachers".
目的 比较两种言语治疗干预方法,即发声热身和呼吸训练,对教师嗓音质量的效果。方法 进行一项单盲、随机、平行临床试验。研究纳入了来自巴西东北部巴伊亚州萨尔瓦多一所公立学校的31名20至60岁教师,他们每周的最低工作量为20小时,且有或没有报告过嗓音改变。排除标准如下:吸烟者、过度饮酒者、在参与研究期间接受额外言语治疗辅助者、患有上呼吸道感染者、在另一活动中专业使用嗓音者、患有神经疾病者以及有心肺疾病史者。通过简单随机化将受试者分为发声热身组(n = 14)和呼吸训练组(n = 17)。言语治疗师通过嗓音障碍指数(巴西版的Índice de Desvantagem Vocal)和计算机化嗓音分析(平均基频、抖动、闪烁、噪声和声门噪声激励比)对教师的嗓音质量进行主观评估。结果 在干预前,两组在社会人口统计学特征、教学活动和嗓音质量方面相似。两组在自我评估和声学嗓音指标方面干预前后的变化没有显著差异。在为期六周的干预前后组间比较中,观察到两组受试者的嗓音障碍指数均显著降低,发声热身组的平均基频降低,呼吸训练组的闪烁增加。与呼吸训练组相比,发声热身组的受试者报告说说话更轻松,总体嗓音改善更大。结论 两种干预方法对教师嗓音质量的影响相似。然而,每种干预方法都分别有助于改善教师的嗓音质量,尤其是发声热身。试验注册号NCT02102399,“教师的发声热身和呼吸肌训练” 。