• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌六种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测的评估。

Assessment of a Combined Panel of Six Serum Tumor Markers for Lung Cancer.

机构信息

1 Laboratory of Biochemistry (Oncobiology Unit), Biomedical Diagnostic Center (CDB).

2 Respiratory Institute.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 15;193(4):427-37. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201404-0603OC.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.201404-0603OC
PMID:26465739
Abstract

RATIONALE

We have previously identified six serum tumor markers (TMs) (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 15.3, squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, neuron-specific enolase, and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide) related to the presence of lung cancer (LC).

OBJECTIVES

To validate their individual performance in an independent cohort, and to explore if their combined assessment (≥1 abnormal TM value) is a more accurate marker for LC presence.

METHODS

We determined these six TMs in 3,144 consecutive individuals referred to our institution by their primary care physician because of the clinical suspicion of LC.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

LC was excluded in 1,316 individuals and confirmed in 1,828 patients (1,563 with non-small cell LC and 265 with small cell LC). This study validated the previously reported performance of each individual TM. We also showed that their combined assessment (≥1 abnormal TM) had a better sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value (88.5, 82, 83.7, and 87.3%, respectively) than each TM considered individually and that it increased the diagnostic performance (area under the curve) of a clinical model that included tumor size, age, and smoking status. In patients with radiographic nodules less than 3 cm, the negative predictive value of the TM panel was 71.8%, hence providing some support for a more conservative diagnostic approach. Finally we identified two TMs (neuron-specific enolase and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide) that differentiate the risk of non-small cell LC from that of small cell LC.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined assessment of a panel of six serum TMs is a more accurate marker for LC presence than these same TMs considered individually. The potential of these TMs in the diagnostic and screening settings deserves further research.

摘要

背景

我们之前已经确定了六个与肺癌(LC)存在相关的血清肿瘤标志物(TMs)(癌胚抗原、糖链抗原 15.3、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原、细胞角蛋白 19 片段、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和胃泌素释放肽前体)。

目的

验证这些标志物在独立队列中的个体表现,并探讨其联合评估(≥1 个异常 TM 值)是否是 LC 存在的更准确标志物。

方法

我们在因临床怀疑 LC 而由其初级保健医生转介到我们机构的 3144 例连续个体中确定了这六个 TMs。

测量和主要结果

在 1316 例个体中排除了 LC,并在 1828 例患者中证实了 LC(1563 例非小细胞 LC 和 265 例小细胞 LC)。本研究验证了每个单独 TM 先前报道的性能。我们还表明,它们的联合评估(≥1 个异常 TM)的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值(分别为 88.5%、82%、83.7%和 87.3%)优于每个单独考虑的 TM,并且它提高了包括肿瘤大小、年龄和吸烟状况在内的临床模型的诊断性能(曲线下面积)。在直径小于 3cm 的放射状结节患者中,TM 谱的阴性预测值为 71.8%,因此为更保守的诊断方法提供了一些支持。最后,我们确定了两个 TM(神经元特异性烯醇化酶和胃泌素释放肽前体)可区分非小细胞 LC 和小细胞 LC 的风险。

结论

与单独考虑的这些 TM 相比,一组六种血清 TMs 的联合评估是 LC 存在的更准确标志物。这些 TM 在诊断和筛查中的潜力值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Assessment of a Combined Panel of Six Serum Tumor Markers for Lung Cancer.肺癌六种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测的评估。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 15;193(4):427-37. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201404-0603OC.
2
The diagnostic and prognostic value of ProGRP in lung cancer.胃泌素释放肽前体在肺癌中的诊断和预后价值。
Anticancer Res. 2009 Nov;29(11):4827-32.
3
Triple test with tumor markers CYFRA 21.1, HE4, and ProGRP might contribute to diagnosis and subtyping of lung cancer.使用肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白片段21.1(CYFRA 21.1)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)和胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)进行三联检测可能有助于肺癌的诊断和亚型分类。
Clin Biochem. 2018 Aug;58:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase in lung cancer diagnosis: a prospective study from China.鳞状细胞癌抗原、癌胚抗原、细胞角蛋白 19 片段 21-1 和神经元特异性烯醇化酶在肺癌诊断中的应用:来自中国的一项前瞻性研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Oct;124(20):3244-8.
5
[The diagnostic significance of single or combination lung cancer-related serum biomarkers in high risk lung cancer patients].[单一或联合肺癌相关血清生物标志物在高危肺癌患者中的诊断意义]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;55(1):25-30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.01.007.
6
Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19-fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in patients with lung cancer in comparison to other lung diseases.与其他肺部疾病患者相比,肺癌患者体内的胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA 21-1)情况。
Anticancer Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2A):885-93.
7
Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in monitoring first-line chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer.核小体、胃泌素释放肽前体、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、细胞角蛋白19片段、癌胚抗原在小细胞肺癌一线化疗监测中的应用
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 1;14(23):7813-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0678.
8
Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP)--a useful marker in small cell lung carcinomas.胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)——小细胞肺癌的一种有用标志物。
Anticancer Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4A):2673-8.
9
New and old biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer: Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide in comparison with neuron-specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and CYFRA 21-1.肺癌鉴别诊断中的新型和传统生物标志物:胃泌素释放肽与神经元特异性烯醇化酶、癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白 19 片段 21-1 的比较。
Int J Biol Markers. 2019 Jun;34(2):163-167. doi: 10.1177/1724600819834235. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) in patients with benign and malignant diseases: comparison with CEA, SCC, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in patients with lung cancer.良性和恶性疾病患者的胃泌素释放肽前体(proGRP):与肺癌患者的癌胚抗原(CEA)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA 21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的比较
Anticancer Res. 2005 May-Jun;25(3A):1773-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a prediction model for pulmonary nodules using circulating tumor cells combined with the uAI platform.利用循环肿瘤细胞结合uAI平台开发肺结节预测模型。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 23;15:1594499. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1594499. eCollection 2025.
2
The Future of Tumor Markers: Advancing Early Malignancy Detection Through Omics Technologies, Continuous Monitoring, and Personalized Reference Intervals.肿瘤标志物的未来:通过组学技术、持续监测和个性化参考区间推进早期恶性肿瘤检测
Biomolecules. 2025 Jul 14;15(7):1011. doi: 10.3390/biom15071011.
3
Tumor marker elevations in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study.
慢性肾脏病中肿瘤标志物的升高:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 3;13:e19240. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19240. eCollection 2025.
4
Risk Factors for Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Anlotinib Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受安罗替尼治疗的肺癌患者预后的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Respir J. 2025 Feb;19(2):e70051. doi: 10.1111/crj.70051.
5
Minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules-challenges and future perspectives.用于肺结节分类的微创生物标志物——挑战与未来展望
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025 Jan 31;44(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s10555-025-10247-5.
6
Retrospective evaluation of plasma protein tumour markers for early lung cancer detection.用于早期肺癌检测的血浆蛋白肿瘤标志物的回顾性评估。
BJC Rep. 2024 Aug 19;2(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00082-6.
7
Biomarkers Suitable for Early Detection of Intrathoracic Cancers in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.适用于基层医疗中胸内癌症早期检测的生物标志物:一项系统综述
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jan 9;34(1):19-34. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0713.
8
Lung cancer screening: where do we stand?肺癌筛查:我们目前的状况如何?
Breathe (Sheff). 2024 Aug 27;20(2):230190. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0190-2023. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Lung Cancer Biomarkers Associated with Increased Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Middle-aged Chinese Adults.与中国中年成年人外周动脉僵硬度增加相关的肺癌生物标志物
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):88-99. doi: 10.5551/jat.64942. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
10
Prevalence of CEA, CA 125, and CA 15-3 serum tumour markers in different regions of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯不同地区的 CEA、CA125 和 CA15-3 血清肿瘤标志物的流行情况。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jun;45(6):565-571. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20230878.