Gregory Emily F, Chamberlain James M, Teach Stephen J, Engstrom Ryan, Mathison David J
From the *Department of Pediatrics; and †Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences; and ‡Department of Geography, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Feb;33(2):73-79. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000581.
The aim of this study was to examine geographic variation in pediatric low-acuity emergency medical services (EMS) use in Washington, DC.
This cross-sectional analysis of low-acuity EMS transports evaluated arrivals at 2 emergency departments and included 93% of pediatric transports in Washington, DC, during the study period. Low-acuity classification was defined as a triage emergency severity index of 4 or 5 not resulting in transfer, admission, or death. Logistic regression compared low-acuity visits arriving via EMS with all other low-acuity visits. Home zip code represented geographic location. Covariates included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, hour of emergency department arrival, and insurance status.
There were 45,454 low-acuity visits among children aged 0 to 17 years. Of these, 3304 (7.3%) arrived via EMS. The mean age was 5.6 (±5.0) years. Most were African American (84.3%) and had Medicaid insurance (87.3%). Geographic variation predicted EMS use. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of using EMS varied from 1.11 to 2.54 when compared with the lowest EMS use zip code. Odds of EMS use were higher among those with public insurance (adjusted OR [adj OR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.00) and those with evening and overnight arrivals (evening arrival, adj OR of 1.65 and 95% CI of 1.47-1.86; overnight arrival, adj OR of 2.98 and 95% CI of 2.43-3.65).
After adjusting for known covariates, residential zip code was associated with low-acuity EMS activation, stressing the importance of geographic variation in EMS use. Providing alternate means of transportation, or targeted education to certain residential areas, may decrease unnecessary EMS activation.
本研究旨在调查华盛顿特区儿科低 acuity 紧急医疗服务(EMS)使用情况的地理差异。
本横断面分析对低 acuity 的 EMS 转运进行评估,涵盖了研究期间华盛顿特区 2 个急诊科的就诊情况,包括 93%的儿科转运病例。低 acuity 分类定义为分诊紧急严重程度指数为 4 或 5 且未导致转诊、住院或死亡。逻辑回归比较了通过 EMS 到达的低 acuity 就诊病例与所有其他低 acuity 就诊病例。家庭邮政编码代表地理位置。协变量包括患者年龄、性别、种族/民族、急诊科到达时间以及保险状况。
0 至 17 岁儿童中有 45454 次低 acuity 就诊。其中,3304 次(7.3%)通过 EMS 到达。平均年龄为 5.6(±5.0)岁。大多数为非裔美国人(84.3%)且拥有医疗补助保险(87.3%)。地理差异可预测 EMS 的使用情况。与 EMS 使用最少的邮政编码区域相比,使用 EMS 的调整后比值比(OR)在 1.11 至 2.54 之间。拥有公共保险者(调整后 OR [adj OR],1.71;95%置信区间 [CI],1.46 - 2.00)以及在晚上和夜间到达者(晚上到达,调整后 OR 为 1.65,95%CI 为 1.47 - 1.86;夜间到达,调整后 OR 为 2.98,95%CI 为 2.43 - 3.65)使用 EMS 的几率更高。
在对已知协变量进行调整后,居住邮政编码与低 acuity 的 EMS 启动相关,强调了 EMS 使用中地理差异的重要性。提供替代交通方式或针对某些居民区进行有针对性的教育,可能会减少不必要的 EMS 启动。