Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 2;23(4):489-496. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55470.
Emergency medical services (EMS) systems have developed alternative disposition processes for patients (including leaving the patient at the scene, using taxis, and transporting to clinics) vs taking patients directly to an emergency department (ED). Studies show that patients favorably support these alternative options but have not included the perspectives of caregivers of children. Our objective was to describe caregivers' views about these alternative disposition processes and analyze whether caregiver support is associated with sociodemographic factors.
We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers in a pediatric ED. We asked caregivers 15 questions based on a previously validated survey. We then conducted logistic regressions to determine whether sociodemographic factors were associated with levels of support.
We enrolled 241 caregivers. The median age of their children was five years. The majority of respondents were non-Hispanic Black (57%) and had public insurance (65%). We found that a majority of respondents supported all alternative EMS disposition options. The overall level of agreement for survey questions ranged from 51-93%. We grouped questions by theme: non-transport; alternative destinations; communication with EMS physician; communication with primary care physician and sharing records; restricted EMS role; and shared decision-making. Regression analyses for each theme found that race/ethnicity, public insurance, and patient age were not significantly associated with the level of support.
Most caregivers were supportive of alternative EMS disposition options for children with low-acuity complaints. Support did not vary significantly by respondent race/ethnicity, public insurance status, or patient age.
急救医疗服务(EMS)系统为患者(包括将患者留在现场、使用出租车和送往诊所)开发了替代处置流程,而不是直接将患者送往急诊部(ED)。研究表明,患者对这些替代选择表示支持,但并未包括儿童护理人员的观点。我们的目的是描述护理人员对这些替代处置流程的看法,并分析护理人员的支持是否与社会人口因素有关。
我们对儿科 ED 的便利样本进行了调查。我们根据之前验证的调查向护理人员提出了 15 个问题。然后,我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定社会人口因素是否与支持程度相关。
我们招募了 241 名护理人员。他们孩子的中位年龄为五岁。大多数受访者是非西班牙裔黑人(57%),并拥有公共保险(65%)。我们发现,大多数受访者支持所有替代 EMS 处置选择。调查问题的总体同意程度在 51-93%之间。我们根据主题将问题分组:非转运;替代目的地;与 EMS 医生的沟通;与初级保健医生的沟通和记录共享;限制 EMS 角色;和共同决策。每个主题的回归分析发现,种族/民族、公共保险和患者年龄与支持水平没有显著关联。
大多数护理人员支持对低急症投诉的儿童采取替代 EMS 处置方案。支持程度与受访者的种族/民族、公共保险状况或患者年龄没有显著差异。