Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,Universidad de Zaragoza,Zaragoza,Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM).Ministry of Science and Innovation,Madrid,Spain.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Dec;25(6):562-572. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000918. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
In a background of interest in staging models in psychiatry, we tested the validity of a simple staging model of cognitive impairment to predict incident dementia.
A large community sample of adults aged ≥55 years (N = 4803) was assessed in the baseline of a longitudinal, four-wave epidemiological enquiry. A two-phase assessment was implemented in each wave, and the instruments used included the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE); the History and Aetiology Schedule and the Geriatric Mental State-AGECAT. For the standardised degree of cognitive impairment Perneczky et al's MMSE criteria were applied. A panel of psychiatrists diagnosed cases of dementia according to DSM-IV criteria, and cases and sub-cases of dementia were excluded for the follow-up waves. Competing risk regression models, adjusted by potential confounders, were used to test the hypothesised association between MMSE levels and dementia risk.
Out of the 4057 participants followed up, 607 (14.9%) were classified as 'normal' (no cognitive impairment), 2672 (65.8%) as 'questionable' cognitive impairment, 732 (18.0%) had 'mild' cognitive impairment, 38 (0.9%) had 'moderate' cognitive impairment and eight (0.2%) had 'severe' impairment. Cognitive impairment was associated with risk of dementia, the risk increasing in parallel with the level of impairment (hazard ratio: 2.72, 4.78 and 8.38 in the 'questionable', 'mild' and 'moderate' level of cognitive impairment, respectively).
The documented gradient of increased risk of dementia associated with the severity level of cognitive impairment supports the validity of the simple staging model based on the MMSE assessment.
在关注精神科分期模型的背景下,我们测试了一个简单的认知障碍分期模型预测痴呆发病的有效性。
在一项纵向四波流行病学调查的基线中,评估了一个年龄在 55 岁及以上的大型社区成人样本(N=4803)。在每一波中都实施了两阶段评估,使用的工具包括简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、病史和病因学量表以及老年精神状态-AGECAT。为了标准化认知障碍程度,应用了 Perneczky 等人的 MMSE 标准。一组精神病学家根据 DSM-IV 标准诊断痴呆病例,并排除病例和亚病例以进行后续波次的研究。使用竞争风险回归模型,通过潜在混杂因素进行调整,以检验 MMSE 水平与痴呆风险之间的假设关联。
在 4057 名随访参与者中,607 名(14.9%)被归类为“正常”(无认知障碍),2672 名(65.8%)为“可疑”认知障碍,732 名(18.0%)为“轻度”认知障碍,38 名(0.9%)为“中度”认知障碍,8 名(0.2%)为“重度”认知障碍。认知障碍与痴呆风险相关,随着损伤程度的增加,风险也随之增加(可疑、轻度和中度认知障碍水平的风险比分别为 2.72、4.78 和 8.38)。
与认知障碍严重程度相关的痴呆风险增加梯度支持基于 MMSE 评估的简单分期模型的有效性。