Santabárbara J, Lopez-Anton R, Marcos G, De-la-Cámara C, Lobo E, Saz P, Gracia-García P, Ventura T, Campayo A, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Olaya B, Haro J M, Salvador-Carulla L, Sartorius N, Lobo A
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,Universidad de Zaragoza,Zaragoza,Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM),Ministry of Science and Innovation,Madrid,Spain.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Dec;24(6):503-11. doi: 10.1017/S2045796014000390. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
To test the hypothesis that cognitive impairment in older adults is associated with all-cause mortality risk and the risk increases when the degree of cognitive impairment augments; and then, if this association is confirmed, to report the population-attributable fraction (PAF) of mortality due to cognitive impairment.
A representative random community sample of individuals aged over 55 was interviewed, and 4557 subjects remaining alive at the end of the first year of follow-up were included in the analysis. Instruments used in the assessment included the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), the History and Aetiology Schedule (HAS) and the Geriatric Mental State (GMS)-AGECAT. For the standardised degree of cognitive impairment Perneczky et al's MMSE criteria were applied. Mortality information was obtained from the official population registry. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to test the association between MMSE degrees of cognitive impairment and mortality risk. We also estimated the PAF of mortality due to specific MMSE stages.
Cognitive impairment was associated with mortality risk, the risk increasing in parallel with the degree of cognitive impairment (Hazard ratio, HR: 1.18 in the 'mild' degree of impairment; HR: 1.29 in the 'moderate' degree; and HR: 2.08 in the 'severe' degree). The PAF of mortality due to severe cognitive impairment was 3.49%.
A gradient of increased mortality-risk associated with severity of cognitive impairment was observed. The results support the claim that routine assessment of cognitive function in older adults should be considered in clinical practice.
为检验以下假设,即老年人的认知障碍与全因死亡风险相关,且当认知障碍程度加重时风险增加;然后,如果这种关联得到证实,报告因认知障碍导致的死亡的人群归因分数(PAF)。
对一个具有代表性的55岁以上个体的随机社区样本进行访谈,4557名在随访第一年结束时仍存活的受试者被纳入分析。评估中使用的工具包括简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、病史和病因学检查表(HAS)以及老年精神状态(GMS)-AGECAT。对于认知障碍的标准化程度,应用了佩尔内茨基等人的MMSE标准。死亡信息从官方人口登记处获得。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型来检验MMSE认知障碍程度与死亡风险之间的关联。我们还估计了特定MMSE阶段导致的死亡的PAF。
认知障碍与死亡风险相关,风险随认知障碍程度平行增加(风险比,HR:“轻度”障碍程度为1.18;HR:“中度”为1.29;HR:“重度”为2.08)。严重认知障碍导致的死亡的PAF为3.49%。
观察到与认知障碍严重程度相关的死亡风险增加梯度。结果支持在临床实践中应考虑对老年人认知功能进行常规评估的观点。