• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响个人健康记录(PHR)使用以管理健康的因素。

Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health.

机构信息

Center on Aging, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):1124-39. doi: 10.1037/a0033911.

DOI:10.1037/a0033911
PMID:24364414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808915/
Abstract

As the health care industry shifts into the digital age, patients are increasingly being provided with access to electronic personal health records (PHRs) that are tethered to their provider-maintained electronic health records. This unprecedented access to personal health information can enable patients to more effectively manage their health, but little is actually known about patients' ability to successfully use a PHR to perform health management tasks or the individual factors that influence task performance. This study evaluated the ability of 56 middle-aged adults (40-59 years) and 51 older adults (60-85 years) to use a simulated PHR to perform 15 common health management tasks encompassing medication management, review/interpretation of lab/test results, and health maintenance activities. Results indicated that participants in both age groups experienced significant difficulties in using the PHR to complete routine health management tasks. Data also showed that older adults, particularly those with lower numeracy and technology experience, encountered greater problems using the system. Furthermore, data revealed that the cognitive abilities predicting one's task performance varied according to the complexity of the task. Results from this study identify important factors to consider in the design of PHRs so that they meet the needs of middle-aged and older adults. As deployment of PHRs is on the rise, knowledge of the individual factors that impact effective PHR use is critical to preventing an increase in health care disparities between those who are able to use a PHR and those who are not.

摘要

随着医疗保健行业进入数字时代,患者越来越多地被提供访问电子个人健康记录(PHR)的权限,这些记录与提供者维护的电子健康记录相关联。这种对个人健康信息的前所未有的访问权限可以使患者更有效地管理自己的健康,但实际上人们对患者成功使用 PHR 来执行健康管理任务的能力以及影响任务执行的个体因素知之甚少。本研究评估了 56 名中年成年人(40-59 岁)和 51 名老年成年人(60-85 岁)使用模拟 PHR 执行 15 项常见健康管理任务(包括药物管理、查看/解释实验室/测试结果和健康维护活动)的能力。结果表明,两个年龄组的参与者在使用 PHR 完成常规健康管理任务时都遇到了很大的困难。数据还表明,老年人,特别是那些计算能力和技术经验较低的人,在使用该系统时遇到了更大的问题。此外,数据显示,预测一个人任务表现的认知能力因任务的复杂性而异。本研究的结果确定了在设计 PHR 时需要考虑的重要因素,以便它们满足中年和老年人的需求。随着 PHR 的部署不断增加,了解影响有效 PHR 使用的个体因素对于防止在能够使用 PHR 和不能使用 PHR 的人群之间出现健康差距的扩大至关重要。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health.影响个人健康记录(PHR)使用以管理健康的因素。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):1124-39. doi: 10.1037/a0033911.
2
The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population.电子个人健康记录系统在服务不足的成年人群中的可用性。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):491-506. doi: 10.1177/0018720814549238. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
3
Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.初级保健中绑定式个人健康记录的传播与应用
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 1;12(Spring):1c. eCollection 2015.
4
The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures.个人健康记录使用与糖尿病质量指标之间的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):420-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1889-0. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
5
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.如果我们提供它,他们会接受吗?影响患者对个人健康记录和安全消息传递使用意愿的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243.
6
Bridging the digital divide: mobile access to personal health records among patients with diabetes.弥合数字鸿沟:糖尿病患者的移动获取个人健康记录。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan;24(1):43-48.
7
Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population.低收入老年人群使用电子个人健康记录面临的挑战。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Oct 27;11(4):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1256.
8
Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a beacon community.消费者对灯塔社区中个人健康记录的态度。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e104-20.
9
Young adults on the perceived benefits and expected use of personal health records: a qualitative descriptive study.年轻成年人对个人健康记录的感知益处和预期使用情况:一项质性描述性研究。
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Apr 18;23(1):171. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i1.171.
10
Lack of Diversity in Personal Health Record Evaluations with Older Adult Participants: A Systematic Review of Literature.针对老年参与者的个人健康记录评估缺乏多样性:文献系统综述
J Innov Health Inform. 2017 Jan 15;23(4):881. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i4.881.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sectional Study of the Changes in Attitudes of Post-Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Towards Remote Biosignal Monitoring an eHealth Support in a 5-Year Interval.急性冠状动脉综合征患者对远程生物信号监测(一种电子健康支持)态度变化的5年间隔横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6272. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176272.
2
Patient-Centered Outpatient Process Optimization System Based on Intelligent Guidance in a Large Tertiary Hospital in China: Implementation Report.基于智能引导的中国大型三级医院以患者为中心的门诊流程优化系统:实施报告
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 29;13:e60219. doi: 10.2196/60219.
3
Frequency of Electronic Personal Health Record Use in US Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey.美国老年人使用电子个人健康记录的频率:一项全国性调查的横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jul 28;8:e71460. doi: 10.2196/71460.
4
Personal Health Record Software for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Patient-Centered Design Approach.神经内分泌肿瘤的个人健康记录软件:以患者为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jun 3;12:e68788. doi: 10.2196/68788.
5
Evaluation of an e-learning platform promoting electronic personal health record competence: a pilot trial in older adults.评估一个促进电子个人健康记录能力的电子学习平台:一项针对老年人的试点试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22242-0.
6
The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.
7
Affordance trajectories and the usefulness of online records access among older adults in Sweden.瑞典老年人的可供性轨迹与在线记录访问的实用性
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 21;10:20552076241287354. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287354. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Power of narrative: a case study about documenting private insightful experiences while dealing with pain and associated disability.叙事的力量:一个关于记录在应对疼痛及相关残疾时个人深刻见解经历的案例研究。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Dec 22;5:1289373. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1289373. eCollection 2023.
9
Computerized Cognitive and Skills Training in Older People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Index Treatment-Related Changes in Real-World Performance of Technology-Dependent Functional Tasks.老年人轻度认知障碍的计算机认知和技能训练:使用生态瞬时评估指标来衡量与治疗相关的技术依赖性功能任务的真实世界表现的变化。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;32(4):446-459. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
10
Cognitive Performance in Adults' Daily Lives: Is There a Lab-Life Gap?成年人日常生活中的认知表现:是否存在实验室与现实生活的差距?
Res Hum Dev. 2017;14(3):219-233. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2017.1340050. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of numeracy ability and technology skills on older adults' performance of health management tasks using a patient portal.算术能力和技术技能对老年人使用患者门户网站执行健康管理任务的影响。
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Jun;33(4):416-36. doi: 10.1177/0733464812447283. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
2
An exploration of patient and family engagement in routine primary care visits.对患者及其家属参与常规初级保健就诊情况的探索。
Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):188-98. doi: 10.1111/hex.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
3
Factors influencing use of an e-health website in a community sample of older adults.影响社区老年人群体使用电子健康网站的因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):277-84. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000876. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
4
The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: a measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory.医学算数理解量表:一种使用项目反应理论开发的健康算数测量工具。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):851-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12447239. Epub 2012 May 25.
5
Usability evaluation of a personal health record.个人健康记录的可用性评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1233-42. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
6
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
7
New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views.为知情决策增添新元素:一项关于老年人观点的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
8
The value of personal health records for chronic disease management: what do we know?个人健康记录在慢性病管理中的价值:我们了解什么?
Fam Med. 2011 May;43(5):351-4.
9
Randomized trial of depression follow-up care by online messaging.抑郁症在线随访的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):698-704. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1679-8. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review.家庭在常规医疗就诊中的参与:一项荟萃分析综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):823-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 24.