Pollaris Lore, Devos Fien, De Vooght Vanessa, Seys Sven, Nemery Benoit, Hoet Peter H M, Vanoirbeek Jeroen A J
Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 mailbox 706, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Arch Toxicol. 2016 Jul;90(7):1709-17. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1606-6. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Both 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and 4,4-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) can cause occupational asthma. In this study, we optimized our mouse model of chemical-induced asthma in the C57Bl/6 mice strain using the model agent TDI. Furthermore, we validated MDI in this mouse model and investigated whether cross-reactivity between TDI and MDI is present. On days 1 and 8, C57Bl/6 mice were dermally treated (20 µl/ear) with 3 % MDI, 2 % TDI or the vehicle acetone olive oil (AOO) (3:2). On day 15, they received a single oropharyngeal challenge with 0.04 % MDI, 0.01 % TDI or the vehicle AOO (4:1). One day later, airway hyperreactivity (AHR) and pulmonary inflammation in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were assessed. Furthermore, total serum IgE levels, lymphocyte subpopulations in auricular lymph nodes and cytokine levels in supernatants of lymphocytes were measured. Both dermal sensitization with TDI or MDI resulted in increased total serum IgE levels along with T and B cell proliferation in the auricular lymph nodes. The auricular lymphocytes showed an increased release of both Th2 and Th1 cytokines. Mice sensitized and challenged with either TDI or MDI showed AHR, along with a predominant neutrophil lung inflammation. Mice sensitized with MDI and challenged with TDI or the other way around showed no AHR, nor BAL inflammation. Both TDI and MDI are able to induce an asthma-like response in this mouse model. However, cross-reactivity between both diisocyanates remained absent.
2,4-甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI)和4,4'-二苯基甲烷二异氰酸酯(MDI)均可引发职业性哮喘。在本研究中,我们使用模型试剂TDI优化了C57Bl/6小鼠品系中化学诱导哮喘的小鼠模型。此外,我们在该小鼠模型中验证了MDI,并研究了TDI与MDI之间是否存在交叉反应性。在第1天和第8天,用3% MDI、2% TDI或赋形剂丙酮橄榄油(AOO)(3:2)对C57Bl/6小鼠进行皮肤处理(每只耳朵20 μl)。在第15天,它们接受一次经口咽部激发,激发物为0.04% MDI、0.01% TDI或赋形剂AOO(4:1)。一天后,评估气道高反应性(AHR)和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)中的肺部炎症。此外,还测量了血清总IgE水平、耳后淋巴结中的淋巴细胞亚群以及淋巴细胞上清液中的细胞因子水平。用TDI或MDI进行皮肤致敏均导致血清总IgE水平升高,同时耳后淋巴结中的T细胞和B细胞增殖。耳后淋巴细胞显示Th2和Th1细胞因子的释放均增加。用TDI或MDI致敏并激发的小鼠表现出AHR,同时肺部以中性粒细胞炎症为主。用MDI致敏并用TDI激发或反之的小鼠未表现出AHR,也没有BAL炎症。TDI和MDI在该小鼠模型中均能够诱导类似哮喘的反应。然而,两种二异氰酸酯之间仍不存在交叉反应性。