Stefanescu Kristen, Timlin Claire L, Moy Ashley S, Zapotoczny Grzegorz
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Cast21, 1623 W Fulton St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Toxics. 2023 Dec 8;11(12):1002. doi: 10.3390/toxics11121002.
The effects of occupational isocyanate exposure range from asthma and contact dermatitis to neurotoxicity and cancer. Respiratory sensitization due to orthopedic cast application has been well documented. This study aims to compare the safety of standard-of-care fiberglass casts and a novel waterproof cast alternative by measuring the amount of isocyanate released during off-gassing over time. A 3D-printed arm simulator with comparable casing material amounts was placed in a sealed chamber. An isocyanate-sensing color-changing (SafeAir) tag was used to measure the levels of toxic exposure. Triplicate trials were conducted across all time periods (15 min, 1 h, and 24 h) and conditions. The bare arm simulator and freshly opened tags served as negative controls. Normalized pixel intensity indexes and isocyanate release estimates in ppb were derived from ImageJ-analyzed SafeAir tag photos. Fiberglass casts exhibited greater isocyanate release than both the waterproof alternative ( = 0.0002) and no-cast controls ( = 0.0006), particularly at 24 h. The waterproof alternative and no-cast control did not statistically differ ( = 0.1603). Therefore, the waterproof alternative released less isocyanate than the fiberglass casts. Waterproof cast alternatives may be safer than fiberglass by limiting medical professionals' exposure to toxic isocyanates and, thus, decreasing their risk of suffering occupational asthma.
职业性异氰酸酯暴露的影响范围从哮喘、接触性皮炎到神经毒性和癌症。因使用矫形石膏而导致的呼吸道致敏已有充分记录。本研究旨在通过测量随时间脱气过程中释放的异氰酸酯量,比较标准护理玻璃纤维石膏与新型防水石膏替代品的安全性。将具有可比外壳材料量的3D打印手臂模拟器置于密封室内。使用异氰酸酯传感变色(SafeAir)标签来测量有毒暴露水平。在所有时间段(15分钟、1小时和24小时)和条件下进行了三次重复试验。裸露的手臂模拟器和新打开的标签用作阴性对照。通过ImageJ分析的SafeAir标签照片得出归一化像素强度指数和以十亿分比表示的异氰酸酯释放估计值。玻璃纤维石膏的异氰酸酯释放量高于防水替代品(P = 0.0002)和无石膏对照(P = 0.0006),尤其是在24小时时。防水替代品和无石膏对照在统计学上无差异(P = 0.1603)。因此,防水替代品释放的异氰酸酯比玻璃纤维石膏少。防水石膏替代品可能比玻璃纤维石膏更安全,因为它限制了医疗专业人员接触有毒异氰酸酯,从而降低了他们患职业性哮喘的风险。