• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[国际疾病分类第10版(ICD 10)与简明损伤定级标准(AIS)的比较及一种自动转换方法的开发]

[Comparison of ICD 10 and AIS with the Development of a Method for Automated Conversion].

作者信息

Hartensuer R, Nikolov B, Franz D, Weimann A, Raschke M, Juhra C

机构信息

Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster.

Medizincontrolling, Universitätsklinikum Münster.

出版信息

Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Dec;153(6):607-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546217. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1546217
PMID:26468924
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most of the current scores and outcome prediction calculations in traumatology are based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). However, this is not routinely used for documentation and coding of injuries in many countries, including Germany. Instead of the AIS, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is used. While the ICD functions as the basis for automated calculating of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG), no possibility of simple conversion of the 10th version of the ICD into AIS is available so far.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work is to develop and apply a methodology for simple conversion from ICD 10 to current AIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The developed mapping procedure was based on a 1 : n relationship between trauma codes of ICD-10-GM and the codes of the AIS2005. Calculated ISS from the conversion codes were then compared with the actual ISS coding available from the clinical trauma documentation.

RESULTS

It can be shown that, despite the considerable differences in the structure and systematic of both classification systems, an automated translation is technically possible.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary result of the mapping suggests, however, that despite the technical feasibility of a reliable conversion and comparability of ICD 10 and AIS in the required quality is still questionable. An automated conversion is still possible and quality would possibly improve by inclusion of additional information.

摘要

背景

创伤学中目前的大多数评分和预后预测计算都是基于简明损伤定级标准(AIS)。然而,在包括德国在内的许多国家,它并非常规用于损伤的记录和编码。在德国,使用的是国际疾病分类(ICD)而非AIS。虽然ICD是诊断相关分组(DRG)自动计算的基础,但目前尚无将ICD第十版简单转换为AIS的方法。

目的

本研究旨在开发并应用一种将ICD-10简单转换为当前AIS的方法。

材料与方法

所开发的映射程序基于ICD-10-GM创伤编码与AIS2005编码之间1:n的关系。然后将转换编码计算出的损伤严重度评分(ISS)与临床创伤记录中实际的ISS编码进行比较。

结果

结果表明,尽管两个分类系统在结构和体系上存在显著差异,但技术上实现自动转换是可行的。

结论

然而,映射的初步结果表明,尽管可靠转换在技术上可行,但ICD-10和AIS在所需质量上的可比性仍存在疑问。自动转换仍然可行,纳入更多信息可能会提高质量。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of ICD 10 and AIS with the Development of a Method for Automated Conversion].[国际疾病分类第10版(ICD 10)与简明损伤定级标准(AIS)的比较及一种自动转换方法的开发]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Dec;153(6):607-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546217. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
Comparison of injury severity scores (ISS) obtained by manual coding versus "Two-step conversion" from ICD-9-CM.手动编码与 ICD-9-CM 的“两步转换”获取的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0216206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216206. eCollection 2019.
3
Development of an expert based ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM map to AIS 2005 update 2008.基于专家的ICD - 9 - CM和ICD - 10 - CM到2008年更新版AIS 2005的映射开发。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1191069.
4
Comparisons of survival predictions using survival risk ratios based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Abbreviated Injury Scale trauma diagnosis codes.使用基于国际疾病分类第九版和简明损伤定级标准创伤诊断编码的生存风险比进行生存预测的比较。
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3):563-7; discussion 567-9.
5
A comparison of the Injury Severity Score and the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model.损伤严重度评分与创伤死亡率预测模型的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):47-52; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0d5d.
6
Transforming the German ICD-10 (ICD-10-GM) into Injury Severity Score (ISS)-Introducing a new method for automated re-coding.将德国 ICD-10(ICD-10-GM)转换为损伤严重程度评分(ISS)-引入一种新的自动重新编码方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257183. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluation of an automated inferencing engine generating ICD-9CM codes for physician and hospital billing.用于医生和医院计费的自动推理引擎生成ICD - 9CM编码的评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:873.
8
ISS mapped from ICD-9-CM by a novel freeware versus traditional coding: a comparative study.通过新型免费软件与传统编码对 ICD-9-CM 进行映射的 ISS 与传统编码:一项对比研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Mar 31;18:17. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-17.
9
New Methodology for an Expert-Designed Map From International Classification of Diseases (ICD) to Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3+ Severity Injury.从国际疾病分类(ICD)到简略损伤量表(AIS)3级及以上严重损伤的专家设计图谱的新方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S197-200. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1054987.
10
Evaluation of Neural Machine translation for conversion of International Classification of disease codes to the Abbreviated injury Scale.国际疾病分类代码到简明损伤分级的转换的神经机器翻译评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107183. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Administrative data in pediatric critical care research-Potential, challenges, and future directions.儿科重症监护研究中的行政数据——潜力、挑战及未来方向。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 28;10:1014094. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1014094. eCollection 2022.
2
Agreement Between Standard and ICD-10-Based Injury Severity Scores.基于标准的损伤严重程度评分与基于国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的损伤严重程度评分之间的一致性
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 18;14:201-210. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S344302. eCollection 2022.
3
Transforming the German ICD-10 (ICD-10-GM) into Injury Severity Score (ISS)-Introducing a new method for automated re-coding.
将德国 ICD-10(ICD-10-GM)转换为损伤严重程度评分(ISS)-引入一种新的自动重新编码方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257183. eCollection 2021.
4
[Challenges of digitalization in trauma care].[创伤护理数字化面临的挑战]
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Nov;123(11):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00859-7.
5
Comparison of injury severity scores (ISS) obtained by manual coding versus "Two-step conversion" from ICD-9-CM.手动编码与 ICD-9-CM 的“两步转换”获取的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0216206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216206. eCollection 2019.
6
Open-access programs for injury categorization using ICD-9 or ICD-10.使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)或国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)进行损伤分类的开放获取程序。
Inj Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 9;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0149-8.