• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Open-access programs for injury categorization using ICD-9 or ICD-10.使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)或国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)进行损伤分类的开放获取程序。
Inj Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 9;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0149-8.
2
How does Injury Severity Score derived from International Classification of Diseases Programs for Injury Categorization using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes perform compared with Injury Severity Score derived from Trauma Quality Improvement Program?基于国际疾病分类第十版临床修订版损伤分类的国际疾病分类方案衍生的损伤严重度评分与创伤质量改进计划衍生的损伤严重度评分相比表现如何?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jan 1;94(1):141-147. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003656. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
ISS mapped from ICD-9-CM by a novel freeware versus traditional coding: a comparative study.通过新型免费软件与传统编码对 ICD-9-CM 进行映射的 ISS 与传统编码:一项对比研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Mar 31;18:17. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-17.
4
Validating the Use of ICD-9 Code Mapping to Generate Injury Severity Scores.验证使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码映射生成损伤严重程度评分的方法。
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):4-14. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000255.
5
Predicting work-related disability and medical cost outcomes: a comparison of injury severity scoring methods.预测与工作相关的残疾和医疗费用结果:损伤严重程度评分方法的比较。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.024. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
6
Validation of ICDPIC software injury severity scores using a large regional trauma registry.使用大型区域创伤登记处对ICDPIC软件损伤严重程度评分进行验证。
Inj Prev. 2015 Oct;21(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041524. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Evaluation of Neural Machine translation for conversion of International Classification of disease codes to the Abbreviated injury Scale.国际疾病分类代码到简明损伤分级的转换的神经机器翻译评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107183. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Transforming the German ICD-10 (ICD-10-GM) into Injury Severity Score (ISS)-Introducing a new method for automated re-coding.将德国 ICD-10(ICD-10-GM)转换为损伤严重程度评分(ISS)-引入一种新的自动重新编码方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257183. eCollection 2021.
9
Agreement Between Standard and ICD-10-Based Injury Severity Scores.基于标准的损伤严重程度评分与基于国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的损伤严重程度评分之间的一致性
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 18;14:201-210. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S344302. eCollection 2022.
10
Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes.使用从ICD - 9编码派生的预测分层网络模型评估创伤患者的损伤严重程度和生存概率。
J Trauma. 1995 Apr;38(4):590-7; discussion 597-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199504000-00022.

引用本文的文献

1
The Financial Toll of Social Determinants of Health on Orthopedic Trauma Care: A National Perspective.健康的社会决定因素对骨科创伤护理的经济影响:全国视角
Cureus. 2025 Aug 1;17(8):e89212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89212. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes of hospitalization for non-operative trauma.虚弱与非手术创伤住院患者临床及经济结局的关联
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Apr 30;26:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.04.008. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Application of the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Model for Predicting the Abbreviated Injury Scale in Patients with Trauma: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.基于Transformer模型的双向编码器表征在创伤患者简明损伤定级预测中的应用:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 29;9:e67311. doi: 10.2196/67311.
4
Hospital experience with geriatric trauma impacts long-term survival.医院老年创伤治疗经验影响长期生存率。
Am J Surg. 2025 Apr;242:116227. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116227. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Emergency medical services level of training is associated with mortality in trauma patients: A combined prehospital and in hospital database analysis.急诊医疗服务培训水平与创伤患者死亡率相关:一项院前与院内数据库联合分析
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):402-409. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004540. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Modeling healthcare demands and long-term costs following pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤后的医疗需求及长期成本建模
Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 29;15:1385100. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1385100. eCollection 2024.
7
Quantifying health insurance eligibility impact on interhospital transfers of injured patients: Evidence from the affordable care act's dependent coverage provision.量化健康保险资格对受伤患者院际转诊的影响:来自《平价医疗法案》受抚养人保险条款的证据。
Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108921. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
8
Comparison of deep learning approaches to estimate injury severity from the International Classification of Diseases codes.深度学习方法比较,以从国际疾病分类代码估计损伤严重程度。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(sup1):S25-S32. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2356663. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
9
Neurodevelopmental disorders in children born to mothers involved in maternal motor vehicle crashes.母亲发生机动车碰撞事故所生儿童的神经发育障碍
Pediatr Res. 2024 Sep 30. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03608-3.
10
Neighborhood Deprivation and Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.老年人创伤性脑损伤后的邻里剥夺与恢复
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating the Use of ICD-9 Code Mapping to Generate Injury Severity Scores.验证使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码映射生成损伤严重程度评分的方法。
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):4-14. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000255.
2
Development of an expert based ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM map to AIS 2005 update 2008.基于专家的ICD - 9 - CM和ICD - 10 - CM到2008年更新版AIS 2005的映射开发。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1191069.
3
Proposed Framework for Presenting Injury Data Using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Diagnosis Codes.使用《国际疾病分类第十次修订本,临床修订版》(ICD-10-CM)诊断编码呈现损伤数据的拟议框架。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2016 Jan 22(89):1-20.
4
[Comparison of ICD 10 and AIS with the Development of a Method for Automated Conversion].[国际疾病分类第10版(ICD 10)与简明损伤定级标准(AIS)的比较及一种自动转换方法的开发]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Dec;153(6):607-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546217. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
5
Predicting in-hospital mortality of traffic victims: A comparison between AIS-and ICD-9-CM-related injury severity scales when only ICD-9-CM is reported.预测交通受害者的院内死亡率:仅报告ICD-9-CM时,AIS与ICD-9-CM相关损伤严重程度量表的比较。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
6
Validation of ICDPIC software injury severity scores using a large regional trauma registry.使用大型区域创伤登记处对ICDPIC软件损伤严重程度评分进行验证。
Inj Prev. 2015 Oct;21(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041524. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Predicting work-related disability and medical cost outcomes: a comparison of injury severity scoring methods.预测与工作相关的残疾和医疗费用结果:损伤严重程度评分方法的比较。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.024. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
8
Overcoming barriers to population-based injury research: development and validation of an ICD10-to-AIS algorithm.克服基于人群的伤害研究障碍:ICD10 到 AIS 算法的开发和验证。
Can J Surg. 2012 Feb;55(1):21-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017510.
9
ISS mapped from ICD-9-CM by a novel freeware versus traditional coding: a comparative study.通过新型免费软件与传统编码对 ICD-9-CM 进行映射的 ISS 与传统编码:一项对比研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Mar 31;18:17. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-17.
10
TMPM-ICD9: a trauma mortality prediction model based on ICD-9-CM codes.TMPM-ICD9:一种基于国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)编码的创伤死亡率预测模型。
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):1032-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a38f28.

使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)或国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)进行损伤分类的开放获取程序。

Open-access programs for injury categorization using ICD-9 or ICD-10.

作者信息

Clark David E, Black Adam W, Skavdahl David H, Hallagan Lee D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.

MMC Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, 509 Forest Avenue, Portland, ME, 04101, USA.

出版信息

Inj Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 9;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40621-018-0149-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40621-018-0149-8
PMID:29629480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5890002/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The article introduces Programs for Injury Categorization, using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and R statistical software (ICDPIC-R). Starting with ICD-8, methods have been described to map injury diagnosis codes to severity scores, especially the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). ICDPIC was originally developed for this purpose using Stata, and ICDPIC-R is an open-access update that accepts both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), Admission Year 2015. ICDPIC-R derives CDC injury mechanism categories and an approximate ISS ("RISS") from either ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. For ICD-9-coded cases, RISS is derived similar to the Stata package (with some improvements reflecting user feedback). For ICD-10-coded cases, RISS may be calculated in several ways: The "GEM" methods convert ICD-10 to ICD-9 (using General Equivalence Mapping tables from CMS) and then calculate ISS with options similar to the Stata package; a "ROCmax" method calculates RISS directly from ICD-10 codes, based on diagnosis-specific mortality in the NTDB, maximizing the C-statistic for predicting NTDB mortality while attempting to minimize the difference between RISS and ISS submitted by NTDB registrars (ISSAIS). Findings were validated using data from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS, 2015).

RESULTS

NTDB contained 917,865 cases, of which 86,878 had valid ICD-10 injury codes. For a random 100,000 ICD-9-coded cases in NTDB, RISS using the GEM methods was nearly identical to ISS calculated by the Stata version, which has been previously validated. For ICD-10-coded cases in NTDB, categorized ISS using any version of RISS was similar to ISSAIS; for both NTDB and NIS cases, increasing ISS was associated with increasing mortality. Prediction of NTDB mortality was associated with C-statistics of 0.81 for ISSAIS, 0.75 for RISS using the GEM methods, and 0.85 for RISS using the ROCmax method; prediction of NIS mortality was associated with C-statistics of 0.75-0.76 for RISS using the GEM methods, and 0.78 for RISS using the ROCmax method. Instructions are provided for accessing ICDPIC-R at no cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal methods of injury categorization and injury severity scoring involve trained personnel with access to injured persons or their medical records. ICDPIC-R may be a useful substitute when this ideal cannot be obtained.

摘要

背景

本文介绍了使用国际疾病分类法(ICD)和R统计软件(ICDPIC-R)进行损伤分类的程序。从ICD-8开始,已有方法可将损伤诊断编码映射为严重程度评分,特别是简明损伤定级(AIS)和损伤严重度评分(ISS)。ICDPIC最初是为此目的使用Stata开发的,而ICDPIC-R是一个开放获取的更新版本,它同时接受ICD-9和ICD-10编码。

方法

数据来自国家创伤数据库(NTDB),收录年份为2015年。ICDPIC-R可从ICD-9或ICD-10编码中得出美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的损伤机制类别和一个近似的ISS(“RISS”)。对于ICD-9编码的病例,RISS的推导方式与Stata软件包类似(有一些改进以反映用户反馈)。对于ICD-10编码的病例,RISS可以通过几种方式计算:“GEM”方法将ICD-10转换为ICD-9(使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的通用等效映射表),然后使用与Stata软件包类似的选项计算ISS;“ROCmax”方法直接根据NTDB中特定诊断的死亡率从ICD-10编码计算RISS,在尝试最小化RISS与NTDB登记员提交的ISS(ISSAIS)之间差异的同时,最大化预测NTDB死亡率的C统计量。研究结果使用来自国家住院病人调查(NIS,2015年)的数据进行了验证。

结果

NTDB包含917,