Digby Genevieve Christina, Keenan Sean P, Parker Christopher M, Sinuff Tasnim, Burns Karen E, Mehta Sangeeta, Ronco Juan J, Kutsogiannis Demetrios J, Rose Louise, Ayas Najib T, Berthiaume Luc R, D'Arsigny Christine L, Stollery Daniel E, Muscedere John
Can Respir J. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6):331-40. doi: 10.1155/2015/971218. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
The extent of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use for patients with acute respiratory failure in Canadian hospitals, indications for use and associated outcomes are unknown.
To describe NIV practice variation in the acute setting.
A prospective observational study involving 11 Canadian tertiary care centres was performed. Data regarding NIV indication, mode and outcomes were collected for all adults (>16 years of age) treated with NIV for acute respiratory failure during a four-week period (between February and August 2011). Logistic regression with site as a random effect was used to examine the association between preselected predictors and mortality or intubation.
A total of 330 patients (mean [± SD] 30±12 per centre) were included. The most common indications for NIV initiation were pulmonary edema (104 [31.5%]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (99 [30.0%]). Significant differences in indications for NIV use across sites, specialty of ordering physician and location of NIV initiation were noted. Although intubation rates were not statistically different among sites (range 10.3% to 45.4%), mortality varied significantly (range 6.7% to 54.5%; P=0.006). In multivariate analysis, the most significant independent predictor of avoiding intubation was do-not-resuscitate status (OR 0.11 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.37]).
Significant variability existed in NIV use and associated outcomes among Canadian tertiary care centres. Assignment of do-not-resuscitate status prevented intubation.
加拿大医院中急性呼吸衰竭患者使用无创通气(NIV)的程度、使用指征及相关结局尚不清楚。
描述急性情况下无创通气的实践差异。
开展了一项涉及加拿大11个三级护理中心的前瞻性观察性研究。收集了2011年2月至8月四周期间所有接受无创通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭的成年人(>16岁)的无创通气指征、模式及结局数据。采用以机构为随机效应的逻辑回归分析,以检验预先选定的预测因素与死亡率或插管之间的关联。
共纳入330例患者(每个中心平均[±标准差]30±12例)。启动无创通气最常见的指征是肺水肿(104例[31.5%])和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(99例[30.0%])。观察到各机构间无创通气使用指征、开单医生专业及无创通气启动地点存在显著差异。虽然各机构间插管率无统计学差异(范围为10.3%至45.4%),但死亡率差异显著(范围为6.7%至54.5%;P=0.006)。多变量分析中,避免插管最显著的独立预测因素是不进行心肺复苏状态(比值比0.11[95%置信区间0.03至0.37])。
加拿大三级护理中心在无创通气使用及相关结局方面存在显著差异。不进行心肺复苏状态可避免插管。