• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母胎分诊指数的评分者间信度测试

Interrater Reliability Testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index.

作者信息

Ruhl Catherine, Scheich Benjamin, Onokpise Brea, Bingham Debra

出版信息

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):710-6. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12762. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/1552-6909.12762
PMID:26469540
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct interrater reliability testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage.

DESIGN

Observational study of a convenience sample of nurses' triage assessments of hospital-based obstetric patients.

SETTING

A birth unit of a suburban hospital located in a large metropolitan region with approximately 5,200 births annually.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten registered nurses provided triage assessments of 211 pregnant women.

METHODS

Using blinded paired triage assessments, we assessed the reproducibility of the triage priority levels assigned using the MFTI.

RESULTS

Priority levels assigned by the MFTI research nurse and the study nurses were in agreement for 154 of the 211 (72.9%) triage assessments. The strength of agreement was classified as good based upon the weighted kappa score of 0.65. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of assigning priority levels between the day and night shifts

CONCLUSION

The interrater reliability of the MFTI met the minimum strength of agreement threshold goal of 0.60 when used by nurses in a large birth unit to assign priority for evaluation. Based on this finding, the MFTI can be recommended for use in obstetric triage settings. Additional testing should be done to measure how this standardized tool improves care processes and outcomes.

摘要

目的

对母胎分诊指数(MFTI)进行评分者间信度测试,这是一种用于产科分诊的标准化工具。

设计

对护士对医院产科患者进行分诊评估的便利样本进行观察性研究。

地点

位于一个大都市地区的郊区医院的产房,每年约有5200例分娩。

参与者

10名注册护士对211名孕妇进行了分诊评估。

方法

采用盲法配对分诊评估,我们评估了使用MFTI分配的分诊优先级别的可重复性。

结果

在211例分诊评估中,MFTI研究护士和参与研究的护士分配的优先级在154例(72.9%)中达成一致。根据加权kappa值0.65,一致强度被分类为良好。日班和夜班在分配优先级别的准确性上没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

当大型产房的护士使用MFTI来分配评估优先级时,MFTI的评分者间信度达到了0.60的最低一致强度阈值目标。基于这一发现,MFTI可被推荐用于产科分诊环境。应进行额外测试以衡量这种标准化工具如何改善护理流程和结果。

相似文献

1
Interrater Reliability Testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index.母胎分诊指数的评分者间信度测试
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):710-6. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12762. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
Content Validity Testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index.母胎分诊指数的内容效度测试
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):701-9. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12763. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
3
Implementing an Obstetrics-Specific Triage Acuity Tool to Increase Nurses' Knowledge and Improve Timeliness of Care.实施特定于产科的分诊 acuity 工具以增加护士的知识并提高护理及时性。
Nurs Womens Health. 2018 Aug;22(4):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Women's Satisfaction With Obstetric Triage Services.女性对产科分诊服务的满意度。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):693-700. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12759. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
5
Implementation of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index to Improve Obstetric Triage.实施孕产妇胎儿分类指数以改善产科分诊。
Nurs Womens Health. 2022 Aug;26(4):269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
Reliability of computerized emergency triage.计算机化急诊分诊的可靠性
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):269-75. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.014. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
7
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
8
Accuracy and interrater reliability of paediatric emergency department triage.儿科急诊科分诊的准确性及评估者间信度
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Oct;27(5):447-52. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12455. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
Manchester Triage in Sweden - interrater reliability and accuracy.瑞典的曼彻斯特分诊法——评估者间信度与准确性
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jul;17(3):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
10
Evaluation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index in a tertiary care labor and delivery unit.评价三级护理分娩单位的母体-胎儿分诊指数。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100351. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100351. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Social vulnerability and triage acuity among pregnant people seeking unscheduled hospital care.寻求非预约住院治疗的孕妇的社会脆弱性和分诊 acuity。(注:这里“acuity”可能是专业术语,原词未翻译完整,需结合专业知识准确理解其含义)
J Perinat Med. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2025-0095.
2
Interobserver agreement in Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics implementation.产科接收与风险分层中的观察者间一致性实施情况。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Dec 13;77(5):e20230361. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0361. eCollection 2024.
3
The design of an Obstetric Telephone Triage Guideline (OTTG): a mixed method study.
产科电话分诊指南(OTTG)设计:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03076-1.
4
Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients - introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system.改善急性产科患者评估——引入瑞典产科分诊系统。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07210-9.
5
An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system.哥德堡产科分诊系统的信度研究——一种新的产科分诊系统。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 2;21(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2.
6
Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.荷兰产科电话分诊的可靠性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug 7;14:3247-3254. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S319564. eCollection 2021.
7
Validation of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: A Prospective Validation Study.荷兰产科电话分诊系统的验证:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 10;14:1907-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306390. eCollection 2021.
8
Obstetric triage systems: a systematic review of measurement properties (Clinimetric).产科分诊系统:测量特性的系统评价(临床计量学)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02974-0.
9
Obstetric Triage Scales; a Narrative Review.产科分诊量表:一项叙述性综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 13;7(1):e13. eCollection 2019 Winter.
10
Mapping Perinatal Nursing Process Measurement Concepts to Standard Terminologies.将围产期护理过程测量概念映射到标准术语。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Jul;34(7):312-20. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000243.