Ruhl Catherine, Scheich Benjamin, Onokpise Brea, Bingham Debra
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):710-6. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12762. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
To conduct interrater reliability testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage.
Observational study of a convenience sample of nurses' triage assessments of hospital-based obstetric patients.
A birth unit of a suburban hospital located in a large metropolitan region with approximately 5,200 births annually.
Ten registered nurses provided triage assessments of 211 pregnant women.
Using blinded paired triage assessments, we assessed the reproducibility of the triage priority levels assigned using the MFTI.
Priority levels assigned by the MFTI research nurse and the study nurses were in agreement for 154 of the 211 (72.9%) triage assessments. The strength of agreement was classified as good based upon the weighted kappa score of 0.65. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of assigning priority levels between the day and night shifts
The interrater reliability of the MFTI met the minimum strength of agreement threshold goal of 0.60 when used by nurses in a large birth unit to assign priority for evaluation. Based on this finding, the MFTI can be recommended for use in obstetric triage settings. Additional testing should be done to measure how this standardized tool improves care processes and outcomes.
对母胎分诊指数(MFTI)进行评分者间信度测试,这是一种用于产科分诊的标准化工具。
对护士对医院产科患者进行分诊评估的便利样本进行观察性研究。
位于一个大都市地区的郊区医院的产房,每年约有5200例分娩。
10名注册护士对211名孕妇进行了分诊评估。
采用盲法配对分诊评估,我们评估了使用MFTI分配的分诊优先级别的可重复性。
在211例分诊评估中,MFTI研究护士和参与研究的护士分配的优先级在154例(72.9%)中达成一致。根据加权kappa值0.65,一致强度被分类为良好。日班和夜班在分配优先级别的准确性上没有统计学上的显著差异。
当大型产房的护士使用MFTI来分配评估优先级时,MFTI的评分者间信度达到了0.60的最低一致强度阈值目标。基于这一发现,MFTI可被推荐用于产科分诊环境。应进行额外测试以衡量这种标准化工具如何改善护理流程和结果。